Bahrain rooms

Barbar, northern Bahrain, Bahrain

The Barbar temple

Centuries around 2000 BC (three temples, and a copper bull under the floor)

The Barbar temple, limestone platforms and dressed blocks. A town stands beyond the fence. The file’s caption spans about 3000 to 2000 BC, which is wider than the excavators’ centuries. The copper bull is not in the frame. Richard Mortel, CC BY 2.0. Shown unedited.

Three temples at Barbar, stacked in the centuries around 2000 BC, keep a stair down to a spring and a copper bull’s head under the floor of the second. The excavators’ dates and the radiocarbon dates are decades apart. A wider “third millennium” is also in print.

Why this is extraordinary

South of the village of Barbar, on the north coast of Bahrain, a mound dug in 1954–1962 held three temples, each built on and around the one before, in the centuries around 2000 BC, when the island was Dilmun. The excavators set Temple I at about 2100–2050 BC, Temple II at about 2050–1900, and Temple III at about 1900–1800. Radiocarbon has since pushed those centuries several decades earlier. A tentative World Heritage text also says the temples were built in the third and second millennia BC, a looser start. The file on the photograph says about 3000 to 2000 BC. Three clocks are in print. They are not the same width.

Temple I stood on a rectangular platform about 25 metres by 16 to 18, preserved to about 2 metres, on clean sand over blue clay. In the foundation were groups of seven clay beakers, broken and buried, and small heaps of copper. A stair in the southwest corner went down to a square well. Temple II enlarged the oval court in limestone brought by boat from Jidda island, cut and dressed. The photograph is that kind of block, platforms and fitted stone, with the modern town beyond. A double circular altar stood in the shrine. Three cult stones were shaped like ship anchors, the middle one with an animal head. From the central terrace a covered stair went down to a chamber on the spring.

The famous object was under the floor. About 50 centimetres below the central platform of Temple II, with rectangular copper plates set with nails, was a bull’s head of copper, moulded in one piece, about 18 centimetres high and 15 across the horns. It has been read as a Sumerian prototype of the Early Dynastic, as a cousin of a gold and silver bull from Altyn Depe in Turkmenistan, as two local heads in one wide network rather than a direct copy, and as the sound-box fitting of a lyre like the ones from Ur. The heads share a flat muzzle and eyes set to the front. The horns, the ears, and the way they join the skull do not match. A foundation deposit, a god’s emblem, and a piece of an instrument are three uses for one sculpture. The plates and the nails were with it. They look like fittings. They do not say of what.

The spring is the other reading. A chamber on fresh water, reached by a stair, is compared with the apsu, the underground freshwater ocean of Enki in Mesopotamian temples, a feature the texts describe and the digs in Mesopotamia rarely catch. The comparison is offered with a “perhaps.” On this island the god named in a royal tomb is Inzak, which the burial mounds already carry. A spring under a temple can be Enki’s ocean, Inzak’s shrine, or the water the building needed. No solstice of the oval, and no azimuth of the stair, is published in the sources used here. The groups of seven beakers are an offering count. They are not, in these reports, a week of the moon. The cult the excavators describe is water, under the floor, not a sunrise.

Why it matters

If the well is an apsu, Bahrain has the freshwater shrine the Mesopotamian texts talk about. If the bull is a lyre or a local emblem, the temple is Dilmun’s, and Enki is a comparison rather than the god of the stair.

The photograph is the limestone platforms. The bull, the seven beakers, and the spring are the parts the picture does not hold.

Photo tour

1 photograph, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

The Barbar temple, limestone platforms and dressed blocks. A town stands beyond the fence. The file’s caption spans about 3000 to 2000 BC, which is wider than the excavators’ centuries. The copper bull is not in the frame. Richard Mortel, CC BY 2.0

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

Open Decades, or a millennium Temple I about 2100–2050, II about 2050–1900, III about 1900–1800 is the excavators’ scheme. Radiocarbon moves it several decades earlier. A third-millennium start, and the photograph’s “about 3000 to 2000,” are wider frames. A temple can begin before its famous phase. The width of the frame is the argument.
Open One bull, several homes The head is about 18 by 15 centimetres, one piece of copper, 50 centimetres under the Temple II platform, with nailed plates. A Sumerian model, an Altyn Depe cousin, a shared network, and a lyre fitting are all published. The flat muzzle is the likeness. The horns are the difference.
Open Enki, Inzak, or a spring The stair and the chamber on fresh water are why an apsu of Enki is suggested. Inzak is the god named on the island’s royal vessels. A well can be holy water without being the ocean under the world. The reports do not print a sunrise for the oval court.

Location and dating

Location
Barbar, on the north coast of Bahrain. The pin is the temple. Jidda island, where the limestone of Temple II was cut, is offshore.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision Early Dilmun, the centuries around 2000 BC in the excavation chronology, with radiocarbon a few decades older and a third-millennium start also printed.
How this dating was done
Pottery and the building sequence, with radiocarbon that shifts the excavators’ centuries earlier by decades. The bull is dated by the floor it was under.
What could change it
A radiocarbon series published phase by phase, not as “several decades,” would show whether Temple I really starts in the third millennium or only a little before 2100.
Published ranges, drawn as bars. A bar is a claim about a span, not a point.
Excavators’ three templesContested
Wider printed spanContested
3000 BCE2500 BCE1800 BCE
  • Excavators’ three temples. About 2100–2050, 2050–1900, and 1900–1800 BC. Radiocarbon pushes the set several decades earlier.
  • Wider printed span. The photograph’s file and some summaries say about 3000 to 2000 BC. The excavation report is the tighter scheme.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Whose spring is it? Open. Enki’s apsu is a comparison. Inzak is the god named on the island. A working well is the third reading.
What was the bull attached to? Open. Plates and nails suggest a fitting. A lyre, an emblem, and a foundation gift are all in print.

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

A Dilmun temple of the centuries around 2000 BC

Barbar is three Early Dilmun temples, with a water shrine and a copper bull buried under Temple II, dated by the excavators to about 2100–1800 BC and a little older on radiocarbon.

What supports this

  • The sequence of three buildings, the Jidda limestone, the well stair, and the groups of seven beakers are in the dig and the listing.
  • The bull’s context is a floor of Temple II, with copper plates.
  • The island in these centuries is the Dilmun of the mounds and the trade texts.

What pushes back

  • A third-millennium start is also printed, so “around 2000” may be the famous phase rather than the first stone.
  • Enki is a maybe. The named god on the royal vessels is Inzak.
  • The bull’s nearest famous cousin, at Altyn Depe, does not match the horns.

What would settle it

It is the centre. A Dilmun temple with a spring and a buried bull is strong. Which god, and which decade, are the edges.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

Enki’s freshwater ocean, and a bull from a wider world

The chamber is an apsu of Enki, and the bull joins Bahrain to Sumer or to the Oxus, as a copy or as a lyre in a Mesopotamian manner.

What supports this

  • Mesopotamian texts put an apsu in temples, and this stair reaches a real spring, which is rare to catch in the ground.
  • A flat muzzle and frontal eyes are shared with the Altyn Depe head, and lyres from Ur wore animal heads.
  • Groups of seven are an offering pattern Mesopotamian temples also use.

What pushes back

  • The horns, ears, and one-piece casting do not match Altyn Depe, so a direct copy is the weak form of the likeness.
  • Inzak, not Enki, is the god named in the island’s own royal inscription.
  • Seven beakers are a count of pots. The reports do not make them a lunar week, and they print no temple azimuth.

What would settle it

The spring makes the apsu a fair comparison. It does not make it the finding. The bull is local copper with neighbours, not a label.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Open to revision

Three temples, a spring stair, and a copper bull under Temple II are solid. The date moves by decades or by a millennium depending on which printed frame you use. Enki, Inzak, and a lyre are readings. No sky alignment of the oval is published.

What drives this

  • Excavators’ dates about 2100–1800 BC, radiocarbon a few decades earlier, and a wider third-millennium frame.
  • A bull about 18 by 15 centimetres, with plates and nails, 50 centimetres under the floor.
  • A stair to fresh water, and Inzak already named on the island.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

A Dilmun temple of the centuries around 2000 BC Unsure Enki’s freshwater ocean, and a bull from a wider world

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

The chamber is Enki’s apsu

A Mesopotamian temple feature that is mostly textual would have a plan, on Bahrain, in the Dilmun centuries.

Why it is still worth a test

A fitting or an inscription in the well chamber that names Enki, which the sources used here do not have.

The bull is a lyre

The plates and nails would be the sound-box, and the head would be an instrument, not only a god’s face in the foundation.

Why it is still worth a test

A reconstruction that uses the plates’ nail pattern, set beside the Ur lyres, and a published match or a published miss.

Sources

  1. Barbar Temple, tentative list UNESCO
  2. New excavations at the Barbar Temple Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy
  3. A disputed case, the deposits from Barbar Temple II Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East

Image credits