Dominican Republic rooms

El Pomier, San Cristóbal, Dominican Republic

Pomier paintings

Pre-Hispanic, the count is the dispute (Igneri and Taíno are both named)

Paintings on the wall of cave number one at El Pomier. Small human figures, one with a rayed head, and a zigzag along the top edge. No scale is in the frame. Tom Crawshaw, CC0 1.0. Shown unedited.

Thousands of paintings cover the caves at El Pomier, unless the careful count is closer to seventeen hundred. The figures include people, animals, and a black maze on a column. Early Spanish pages are the only written cosmology anyone can set beside them.

Why this is extraordinary

In the hills of San Cristóbal, a protected reserve of limestone caves holds the largest body of pre-Hispanic paintings and engravings in the Caribbean, or one of the counts says so. The protected-area text describes 55 cavities and more than 6,000 paintings and engravings, assigned to two cultures, Igneri and Taíno. A 2001 magazine count is close to that: 54 caves, some 6,000 images of birds, fish, reptiles, and humans, the largest cave with about 590 drawings, reported in 1851. The Academy of Sciences of the Dominican Republic later published a different inventory. Art had been counted in 17 cavities: 1,033 paintings and 103 petroglyphs. Allowing for caves not yet tallied, the academy thought about 1,700 known images was a fair total, and said that was not a reckless guess. Six thousand and seventeen hundred cannot both be a head count of the same walls. One of them is an estimate that ran ahead of the tally. The other may have missed caves. The pictures are real either way.

One panel now has a laboratory age, and it does not date the reserve. A charcoal bird, possibly a heron, is 890 ± 30 radiocarbon years. The abstract prints 1045 to 1225 calibrated years AD. The calibration paragraph prints 1045 to 1223. Both are printed here, and they were not smoothed. The authors warn that the plant was not identified, so old wood can make the figure look older than the day the bird was drawn. The same paper says the sun and the moon appear as subjects. That is iconography, pictures of the lights, not an azimuth of a cave mouth. You would need a measured bearing, and a horizon height, before a painting of the sun became a sightline. One bird does not refile every geometric meander.

Some groups of paintings have been read against the early Spanish accounts, especially the short report a friar wrote in the 1490s on Hispaniola. The protected-area text names that friar, Las Casas, and Peter Martyr as the writers people use. A seated figure in cave 2 is published as a behique, a specialist, at the cohoba rite, inhaling a powder through a tube. The photograph shows a seated body and a long form at the face. The powder is not in the paint. A column in the Bridge Cave carries a black meander, filed as an Igneri design, with a small human figure on the wall beside it. Igneri, in that filing, is the earlier people, and Taíno the later. The walls do not come with captions.

The cosmology that gets attached to Caribbean caves is a three-level world in later scholarship, sky, lived earth, and a world below, with caves as the passages. The friar’s text gives the dead a country called Coaybay. It does not say, in the sentences used here, that this meander is a map of that country. Scholars have made the link. A panel can be a rite, a ancestor, a maze, or a mark whose meaning was never written down. Quarry blasts in the limestone around the reserve have been reported as a threat to the paint. That is a conservation fact. It is not a reading of the figures.

Why it matters

If the high count holds, this is the great painted archive of the Caribbean, and a quarry next door is a disaster at that scale. If the lower count holds, the archive is still large, and a round number of 6,000 has been doing too much work. Either way, a friar’s Coaybay is not yet a label on a given panel.

Three photographs, all from the reserve: cave one, the cohoba figure in cave two, and the meander in the Bridge Cave. The pin is El Pomier.

Photo tour

3 photographs, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

Paintings on the wall of cave number one at El Pomier. Small human figures, one with a rayed head, and a zigzag along the top edge. No scale is in the frame. Tom Crawshaw, CC0 1.0
Cave 2. A seated figure and a long form at the head. The file titles this a behique at the cohoba rite. The powder is not painted. Espeleogrupo, CC BY 2.5
The Bridge Cave. A black meander on a column, and a small figure to the left. The file associates the maze with an earlier, Igneri, style. Espeleogrupo, CC BY 2.5

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

Open Six thousand, or about seventeen hundred The reserve text says 55 caves and more than 6,000 paintings and engravings. The 2001 count says 54 caves and some 6,000 images, about 590 in the largest cave. The academy count says 1,033 paintings and 103 petroglyphs in 17 cavities, and about 1,700 if uncounted caves are folded in. A total can shrink when someone finally counts, and it can grow when the next cave is opened. The room keeps both numbers because both are published.
Open A seated figure and a rite Cohoba, in the early accounts, is a rite in which a specialist inhaled a powder and spoke for the spirits. The cave 2 photograph is titled as that scene. What the wall shows is a seated figure and a long dark form toward the face. A title can be right and still be a title. Nothing in the pigment is a bowl of powder.
Open Coaybay, and a maze that is not a map The dead, in the friar’s account, go to Coaybay. Later scholarship reads caves as the way into the world below, in a cosmos of three levels joined by an axis. The Bridge Cave meander is a geometric painting on a flowstone column, with a small figure nearby. Geometry invites a map. The invitation is not a measurement, and no azimuth of the cave mouth is published.

Location and dating

Location
Reserva Antropológica Cuevas del Pomier, section Borbón, San Cristóbal. The pin is 18.468 north, 70.135 west.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision Pre-Hispanic. The reserve text names Igneri and Taíno. One charcoal bird is 890 ± 30 radiocarbon years, with two printed calibrations, 1045 to 1225 and 1045 to 1223, which were not smoothed. That bird does not date the other panels. The 2001 account called the art about 2,000 years old, which is a round figure, not the assay of the bird.
How this dating was done
Style, which is typology, set against the early Spanish accounts, still places most of the walls. One bird is radiocarbon on charcoal, 890 ± 30, and the two calibrations are both kept. Old wood is the catch, because the plant was not identified. Sun and moon are subjects in that paper, not an archaeoastronomy azimuth.
What could change it
A pigment date, or a date on a crust that seals a figure, would put one panel on a calendar and might separate Igneri from Taíno by more than style. A published concordance of the 6,000 estimate and the 1,033 counted paintings would show which caves were never numbered.
Published ranges, drawn as bars. A bar is a claim about a span, not a point.
Charcoal bird, two calibrationsContested
1045 CE1150 CE1225 CE
  • Charcoal bird, two calibrations. 890 ± 30 radiocarbon years on one bird, possibly a heron. The abstract prints 1045 to 1225 calibrated years AD. The calibration paragraph prints 1045 to 1223. Not smoothed. Old wood remains possible.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Which total is the walls? Open. Both totals are in print. They were not made by the same method.
Does any panel depict Coaybay, the sun, or the moon? Open. The 2022 paper says the sun and the moon appear as subjects. No azimuth ties a panel to a sky event. One dated bird does not refile the meanders.

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

Igneri pictures and Taíno pictures in the same hills

The reserve holds two pre-Hispanic traditions. Geometric work such as the meander is filed with the earlier Igneri. Human scenes such as the cohoba figure are filed with the Taíno, and the Spanish accounts are the glossary.

What supports this

  • The protected-area text names both cultures and says some groups of pictures find a reading in the chroniclers.
  • The Bridge Cave file and the cave 2 file are already sorted that way.
  • Coaybay and cohoba are in the sixteenth-century writings, so the words are not modern inventions.

What pushes back

  • The image totals disagree by thousands, which means the sorting is not finished.
  • A style label on a file is not a date.
  • The friar wrote about beliefs. He did not caption these walls.

What would settle it

It is the reading the reserve itself uses. The count problem keeps it from being a closed catalogue.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

One cave religion, sky above and Coaybay below

The paintings are one cosmology. Caves are the passage to the dead, the meander is a path, and the human figures are the beings of that passage.

What supports this

  • The friar names Coaybay as the country of the dead.
  • Later scholarship reads Taíno caves as routes to a world below, in a three-level cosmos.
  • The reserve text says some groups of paintings have been set beside those early accounts.

What pushes back

  • No azimuth, no horizon height, and no panel is published here with a star name.
  • A meander is a common way to fill a long stone. A path is one reading of a rectangle spiral.
  • Two named cultures cut against a single unchanged religion.

What would settle it

It takes the texts seriously, which this museum does. It steps past the texts when it names a particular column as the map.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Open to revision

The caves and the paint are not in doubt. The number of images is in doubt by a factor of several. The link from a friar’s Coaybay and cohoba to a given figure is a real method and not a demonstration. No sky bearing has been measured.

What drives this

  • Two published totals, above 6,000 and about 1,700.
  • A cohoba title on one seated figure.
  • A cosmology in the early accounts, and no azimuth on the cave.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

Igneri pictures and Taíno pictures in the same hills Unsure One cave religion, sky above and Coaybay below

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

The lower count is the real tally

Pomier is still a major Caribbean painted site, and the figure of 6,000 should stop circulating as a census.

Why it is still worth a test

A cave-by-cave concordance that shows which of the 55 cavities were inside the academy’s 17.

The panels are the cosmology

A specific wall is the land of the dead, or the birth of the lights in the sky, and the Spanish pages can be checked against paint.

Why it is still worth a test

A published match of one panel to one passage, with the figure identified, not only the cave.

Sources

  1. Reserva Antropológica Cuevas del Pomier, cultural resources Ministry of Environment, Dominican Republic
  2. Taíno cave art under siege Archaeology magazine
  3. About 1,700 known rock-art images at Pomier Academy of Sciences of the Dominican Republic
  4. The Taíno use of caves, a review Cave and Karst Science
  5. AMS date for a bird in Borbón Cave No. 1 García Diez and others, Latin American Antiquity, 2022. 890 ± 30 radiocarbon years. Abstract 1045 to 1225. Calibration paragraph 1045 to 1223. Sun and moon as subjects.

Image credits