Alexandria, the royal quarter, Egypt
The Library of Alexandria
From the third century BCE (the books and the reports are the question)
The Ptolemies gathered scholars and books in Alexandria, copied what visitors carried, and had the sky measured from a noon shadow. Later writers report fires and a huge collection. The reports do not agree on what burned, how many rolls there were, or whether the books we lack were unique to this house.
Why this is extraordinary
In the early Ptolemaic city a king kept a house of scholars, the Mouseion, inside the royal palaces, and with it a library that later writers treat as the largest Greek collection of its age. The scholars ate together. A priest stood over the house. The books, on the accounts we have, were bought, borrowed, translated, and copied, including books taken from ships in the harbor. Strabo, who walked the palaces after Julius Caesar's war, describes the dining hall and the walk and does not, in that description, use the word library. No trench used here has produced a room that can be named as that library. The modern city sits on the ancient one. The tilted building in the photograph opened in 2002. It is a new library on the harbor, not the old shelves.
People often sort the losses into about three fires, and a fourth report sits beside them. This room does not turn that habit into a count. Caesar's war in 48 BCE, the damage to the royal quarter under Aurelian in the 270s CE, the end of the Serapeum of Alexandria in 391, and a story written down in the thirteenth century about the conquest of about 642 are four reports. Each has a text, a date of writing, and an open edge. A warehouse of books by the water is not the same sentence as the palace library. A ruined quarter is not, by itself, a list of burned titles. A destroyed temple is not, by itself, a catalogue. A late story can carry an older memory, and it can also be a story composed centuries after the day.
What the house is said to have held is the other half of the same question. Ancient counts of the rolls do not agree with each other, and some of those counts do not agree from one manuscript to the next, so this room adopts none of them. Works we know by title do not survive: Eratosthenes' own book on the measurement, the tables of Callimachus, the anatomical books of Herophilus. A small set of Athenian plays survives out of the much larger bodies ancient lists give those poets. Other books associated with this city did survive, Euclid's Elements and Ptolemy's Almagest among them, because someone copied them onward. One reading is that fires removed copies that existed nowhere else. The other is that much had already spread, and what we lack is what later copyists stopped copying. Both stay.
Alexandria was also a center of work on the sky. Eratosthenes, named as head of the library, measured the Earth from a noon shadow. Cleomedes, who preserves the method, has sundials at Syene and at Alexandria, a distance of 5,000 stadia, and a circumference of 250,000 stadia. Strabo reports 252,000. The length of the stadion is not one ancient measure, so no kilometer figure is used here. No published alignment of a library wall is used either. No such wall has been identified to measure.
Why it matters
If the fires removed copies that existed nowhere else, then Greek drama, medicine, and Eratosthenes' own book are missing because of those days, and a papyrus can still surprise us. If the books had already been copied to other cities, the missing works are the ones that stopped being copied, and a fire in one building is not the whole path of loss. The count of rolls, and the count of fires, change what "lost knowledge" can mean. Neither count is a number this room will pretend to own.
The pin is the royal quarter under the modern city, where Strabo places the palaces, and where the new Bibliotheca Alexandrina now stands. It is not a surveyed wall. The temple of Serapis on the hill of the column called Pompey's Pillar is the Serapeum of Alexandria, the place later readers give a smaller, outer library. That temple is not the bull galleries at Saqqara, which have their own room. Another court that sent for texts and kept them is the library at Nineveh. The writing there is clay, and the century is earlier. An Egyptian priest of this same early Ptolemaic world, Manetho, wrote a history of Egypt that survives in later summaries, weighed on the ancient sources page. His book is not a shelf-list of this library.
Photo tour
7 photographs, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.
- No ancient shelf label reading "from the ships" is in a free photograph here. Galen's label is a sentence in a commentary.
- The Pinakes do not survive as a book, so there is no photograph of the catalogue.
- Drawings of the Earth measurement in circulation add a mile figure and a well. The diagram in this room does not.
What is still unexplained
These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.
Location and dating
- Location
- Alexandria, on the Mediterranean. The pin marks the royal quarter under the modern city, the ground where the palaces are placed and where the Bibliotheca Alexandrina, opened in 2002, now stands. It is not a surveyed ancient wall. The Serapeum of Alexandria is the separate hill of the column called Pompey's Pillar.
- Period label
- Current consensus — open to revision The gathering belongs to the early Ptolemies, from Ptolemy I and Ptolemy II in the third century BCE onward. The reports of loss are 48 BCE, the Bruchion under Aurelian about 272 CE, the Serapeum of Alexandria in 391, and a story about the conquest of about 642 first written down in the thirteenth century. No one of those dates is adopted here as the end of every book.
- How this dating was done
- The dates are the kings, the wars, and the writers, not radiocarbon of a library wall, because no such wall is in hand. A writer's century is the date of the report. It is not, by itself, the date of the event. Strabo is after Caesar and describes a living Mouseion. Ammianus is before 391 and describes both a damaged Bruchion and libraries he places in the Serapeum. The Arabic story is about five and a half centuries after 642.
- What could change it
- A foundation text that names the year the library opened, or a dug room whose fittings can be tied to rolls, or a catalogue that is the Pinakes rather than a quotation from them. Any of those would move the placement. A manuscript of Gellius or Orosius does not, by itself, choose the size, because the copies already disagree.
What is actually there
- Strabo describes the Mouseion inside the royal palaces and does not, in that description, say library.
- No excavated room in the sources used here has been identified as the ancient library.
- The Bibliotheca Alexandrina in the photograph opened in 2002. It is a new building.
- Galen describes originals kept, copies returned, and a label "from the ships," and he is writing centuries later.
- The ancient counts of rolls do not agree, and some of them split inside one author's manuscripts.
- Cleomedes reports 250,000 stadia. Strabo reports 252,000. No kilometer figure is adopted.
- Twenty lecture halls at Kom el-Dikka belong to the late Roman city, not to the Ptolemaic shelves.
Open questions
| Question | Status |
|---|---|
| Where, under the modern city, did the Mouseion and the royal library stand? | Open |
| Did Caesar's fire take the palace library, books in waterfront storehouses, or both? | Open |
| Did a daughter library at the Serapeum of Alexandria still hold books in 391? | Open |
| Does the Arabic report of about 642 preserve an older account of a burning? | Open |
| Were the works we lack unique to this house, or had copies already left the city? | Open |
| Which length of the stadion, if any, should be applied to 250,000 or 252,000? | Open. This room does not choose, and it does not print a kilometer. |
The current narrative
Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.
The current narrative — open to revision
Weigh each report on its own
The Mouseion and a royal library in Ptolemaic Alexandria were real. The size of the collection, the path of the copying, and the several reports of loss do not collapse into one fire or one number of rolls. Each report keeps its own text and its own open edge.
What supports this
- Strabo describes a staffed house of scholars inside the royal palaces, and a satirist of the third century BCE already mocks that house.
- Galen, the Letter of Aristeas, and the Suda, writing at very different dates, all describe collecting, copying, or cataloguing. They do not describe the same moment, and they do describe an institution.
- The four reports of loss name different centuries, different writers, and different objects, from dockyard fire to a ruined quarter to a temple to a thirteenth-century story.
- Suetonius has scribes sent to Alexandria to copy books in the late first century CE, and Ammianus still finds teachers and sky study in the city before 391.
What pushes back
- Strabo does not say library, and no dug room has been identified as one, so the building is still a text.
- The counts of rolls contradict one another, and some contradict themselves across manuscripts, which leaves the scale of the house unfixed.
- A reading that one or more fires removed unique books, and a reading that the Arabic report records a real burning, are not answered by keeping the reports side by side.
What would settle it
It holds while the institution is attested and no single destruction count is forced. It moves if a dug room, or a catalogue in its own hand, shows one building and one end.
Emerging narratives
Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.
An emerging narrative
The fires took books that were only here
One or more of the reported fires destroyed copies that had not been made elsewhere. The plays, medical books, and treatises we know only by title or by quotation are missing because those copies burned.
What supports this
- Several ancient writers, Plutarch among them, describe a fire in 48 BCE that reached a great library or a great mass of books, and they give large figures even though the figures disagree.
- Ammianus describes the loss of the Bruchion, the quarter of the palaces, under Aurelian, and he places libraries of great value in the Serapeum before 391.
- The Pinakes, Eratosthenes' own measurement book, and Herophilus's anatomical writings do not survive as books. Quotation is not the book.
What pushes back
- Caesar does not mention books. Dio can be read as waterfront storehouses. The numbers for 48 BCE run from 40,000 to nearly 700,000, and some of those numbers split by manuscript.
- Strabo's Mouseion is still a working house after 48 BCE, and Suetonius still has books in Alexandria worth sending scribes to copy.
- The plays we have are the ones school copying kept. A fire in one city is not the only way a book stops being copied. Euclid and the Almagest show that books from this world did leave.
What would settle it
It stays possible for any title we cannot find in a second city. It weakens where a second copy, or a writer after the fire still using the book, is on the table.
An emerging narrative
Most of it had already been copied out
The library's work was copying. Books moved to Pergamon, to Rome, and into the later manuscript tradition. What we lack is largely what copyists stopped copying, not a single pile of unique rolls lost on one day.
What supports this
- Galen describes a house whose daily work was making copies, keeping originals, and returning the new rolls. A library run that way is a place books leave, as well as a place they gather.
- Suetonius has Roman scribes copying Alexandrian books in the late first century CE. The medieval text of Homer follows the Alexandrian editors. The Almagest survives in a fifteenth-century Greek manuscript, and in Arabic translation.
- Plutarch's report of 200,000 volumes from Pergamon, whatever one makes of the charge, is a story about books moving between royal libraries, not about one sealed room.
What pushes back
- No inventory shows the palace collection transferred as a collection. Survival of some books does not measure the books that were never copied.
- Herophilus, the Pinakes, and Eratosthenes' own treatise are names without the books. If the only copies were here, copying-out does not save them.
- The ancient writers who give huge figures for a fire are describing a loss they thought was large, not a loss they thought was only duplicates.
What would settle it
It stays strong for every work we can still read, and for every work a later writer quotes from a copy. It stays weak for a title that never appears again after a reported fire.
An emerging narrative
A collection was still burned about 642
When Amr ibn al-As took Alexandria, a body of books was still in the city, and it was destroyed on Umar's order, as the thirteenth-century Arabic writers relate.
What supports this
- Abd al-Latif, Ibn al-Qifti, and Bar Hebraeus, independently enough to be three texts rather than one sentence, report a burning by Amr with Umar's approval.
- The longer story names a scholar, a letter, and a method, the baths for six months, and it gives the collection a history back to Ptolemy II.
- A report can be written down late and still carry an older memory. Books could have remained in the city after the earlier wars. Silence in a nearer narrative is not, by itself, a proof that nothing happened.
What pushes back
- The texts are from the early thirteenth century, about five and a half centuries after the conquest. Conquest narratives closer to the event, in the sources used here, do not tell it.
- The scholar in the long story is the one later readers identify with John Philoponus, whose other dated work sits in the sixth century, so the meeting in 642 is part of what is open.
- If the palace library and a Serapeum collection had already been lost, the story still has to say which books were left to heat the baths. The figure 54,120 is a number inside the speech, not a catalogue.
What would settle it
It stays open. A nearer text that tells the same story, or a ground of burned books tied to that year, would move it. The absence of that text does not delete the report.
Should the current view be reevaluated?
Open to revision
The house of scholars is well enough attested to stand. The size of the collection, the number of destructions, and the share of books that were unique are not. Keeping the reports side by side is the careful reading, and it is not a final count.
What drives this
- Strabo's Mouseion, and no identified library room.
- Counts of rolls that disagree, including inside single authors.
- Four reports of loss, each with a different object and a different date of writing.
- Books that survive by later copying, beside titles that do not survive at all.
- A noon-shadow measurement whose stadion has no single length.
This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.
Weigh it yourself
Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.
Visitor lean so far — not evidence. On this browser only; a shared tally is not collected.
If the contested reading is right
What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.
The fires destroyed copies that existed nowhere else
Large parts of Greek drama, medicine, and Eratosthenes' own book would be missing because of those days. A new papyrus would be a recovery, not only a duplicate of a text we already have.
Why it is still worth a test
Titles known from quotation, searched for in papyri and in later libraries, with the date of the last writer who still had the book.
The books had mostly already been copied elsewhere
The missing plays and treatises would be what copyists stopped copying, over many centuries. A fire in Alexandria would be one path of loss among others, and the books we still read would be the evidence that the path was not closed.
Why it is still worth a test
A map of which Alexandrian books are quoted after 48 BCE, after the 270s, and after 391, and in which city the quotation was made.
The report of about 642 records a real burning
A collection would still have been in the city at the conquest, and the earlier fires would not have been the end. The daughter library, the palace library, or some other store would have to be named.
Why it is still worth a test
A text nearer to 642 that tells the story, and a context for the books that is not only the thirteenth-century speech.
Eratosthenes' 250,000 stadia is the circumference in his own unit
A librarian would have measured the Earth with a shadow and a surveyed distance, inside the life of this house. The kilometer value would still wait on the stadion, and the sky work would be part of what the institution did, not a decoration.
Why it is still worth a test
The length of the stadion he used, from a source that states it, and a check of the meridian and the tropic against the 5,000 stadia. Not a mile drawn in afterwards.
Sources
- Commentary on Hippocrates' Epidemics, the ships and the fifteen talents Galen, in a translation at Attalus.org. He is repeating Zeuxis.
- The Letter of Aristeas Translation of R. H. Charles. More than 200,000 rolls, and a hope of 500,000.
- Ammianus Marcellinus, Book 22, chapter 16 Perseus. The Serapeum, 700,000 volumes, and the Bruchion under Aurelian.
- Plutarch, Life of Caesar Loeb translation at LacusCurtius. The fire from the dockyards and the great library.
- Plutarch, Life of Antony 58 Loeb translation. Calvisius's charge of 200,000 volumes from Pergamon.
- Cassius Dio, Roman History 42.38 English version in which the docks, the grain stores, and the library burn. The warehouse reading of the same sentence is weighed in the room.
- Suetonius, Life of Domitian 20 Loeb translation at LacusCurtius. Scribes sent to Alexandria to copy and correct books.
- Alexandria, Library of Dreams Roger S. Bagnall, 2002. The counts, the manuscript splits in Gellius and Orosius, and the several reports of loss.
- Eratosthenes and the circumference of the Earth Nature, 1943. Cleomedes' 250,000 stadia, and Strabo's 252,000.
- The House of Ptolemy, on the Museum and the Pinakes E. R. Bevan, at LacusCurtius. The Suda's 120 books, and the librarians.
- Ibn al-Qifti on the library Roger Pearse, 2010, with a translation. The scholar, the 54,120, and the baths.
- Bar Hebraeus, Abd al-Latif, and the library Roger Pearse, 2010. The short remark and the longer story, both thirteenth century.
- The auditoria on Kom el-Dikka Grzegorz Majcherek. Twenty lecture halls, late fifth to early sixth century, not the Ptolemaic library.
Image credits
- The Bibliotheca Alexandrina, opened in 2002, beside the harbor. A new building. It is not the Ptolemaic library, and no ancient wall of that library has been identified under it. . Vyacheslav Argenberg, CC BY 4.0. Shown unedited.
- Cleomedes' report, drawn for this room. One fiftieth of a circle, 5,000 stadia, 250,000 stadia. Strabo's 252,000 is not drawn. No mile figure. Not a direction of a library wall. . Diagram: Our Deep History.
- A nineteenth-century drawing of the library's hall, by O. Von Corven. An artist's reconstruction. It is not a plan of a dug room, and no ancient wall has been matched to it. . O. Von Corven, Public domain. Shown unedited.
- The column called Pompey's Pillar, on the hill of the Serapeum of Alexandria. The inscription honors Diocletian. This is the temple later readers give a daughter library. It is not the royal library, and it is not the bull galleries at Saqqara. . Daniel Mayer, CC BY-SA 4.0. Shown unedited.
- A Roman marble bust of Serapis in the Vatican, with a grain measure on his head. A copy of a Greek type. It was not lifted from the Serapeum of Alexandria. The god is the one that temple housed. . Jastrow, Public domain. Shown unedited.
- A gold coin in the Pergamon Museum, Berlin. The file's description reads the portraits as Ptolemy II and Arsinoe II, and the inscription as "of the siblings." A portrait of that court, not a coin struck for the library. . MatthiasKabel, CC BY-SA 3.0. Shown unedited.
- PSI 1092, in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Florence. A papyrus of the first century BCE with Callimachus's poem on Berenice's lock. A later copy of a court poem about a constellation, not a roll lifted from the royal shelves. . Unknown photographer, Public domain. Shown unedited.
- Folio 143 of BnF Grec 2392, a fifteenth-century Greek copy of Ptolemy's Almagest. Not Ptolemy's own hand. He worked in Alexandria in the second century CE. This page is how a book from that city reached a later reader, by being copied. . Bibliothèque nationale de France, Public domain. Shown unedited.