Greenland rooms

Uunartoq fjord, southern Greenland, Greenland

The Uunartoq disc

About AD 1200 (half an oak disc, read as a sun compass and as something else)

A drawing of the Uunartoq half-disc, notches on the rim and lines on the face. This is not the oak. Which lines are carved, and which a modern reading has emphasised, has to be checked against the wood. Praenomen3, CC BY-SA 4.0. Shown unedited.

In 1948, in the lower layers under a Norse convent ruin on the Uunartoq fjord in southern Greenland, diggers found half of an oak disc about 7 centimetres across. Triangular notches run around the curved edge. Lines are cut on the face. One reading makes it a sun compass: the curves are the path of a shadow tip at the equinox and near the summer solstice, at about 61 degrees north. Another reading says the wooden discs offered as Viking sun compasses were not navigational instruments at all.

Why this is extraordinary

Under the ruins of a Norse convent on the Uunartoq fjord, in the south of Greenland, the 1948 dig found half of a small oak disc in layers older than the building. It is about 7 centimetres across. Triangular notches march around the curved rim, so the broken edge looks a little like a cog that was never finished. Lines, some straight and some curved, are cut on the flat face. Archaeologists placed the piece around the year 1200. The fjord is near 60 to 61 degrees north, in the Eastern Settlement. A place with the same name far up the west coast is not where this wood was found.

The reading that made the disc famous treats it as a sun compass. A short pin, a gnomon, would stand at the centre. Through the day the tip of its shadow follows a curve. That curve is different on the equinox, when the sun rises due east and the day is split in half, and on a day near the summer solstice, when at this latitude the sun climbs high and the noon shadow is short. If those two curves are the ones cut in the oak, you could turn the disc until the shadow tip sat on the right curve, and the notches would then tell you a direction relative to the sun. A 2013 study goes further and reads some of the straight scratches as the construction lines a maker would draw in order to place the curves, and it sees the disc as a noon board as well as a compass, a way to know when it is local noon and how long the shadow ought to be. That is a sky instrument, if the lines are those lines. You observe it by watching a shadow, not by sighting a star at night.

The catch is the size of the claim and the size of the wood. A 2020 comparison of this disc with two others, from the Baltic, says the sun-compass idea has been repeated without a footing in the historical sources, and that the three objects do not share a function. None of them, in that argument, was for navigation. Other suggestions are a toy, or a confession token, a notched reminder of religious duties. The tokens that get cited are 17th- and 18th-century and Lutheran, and medieval Greenland was Catholic, so that parallel was offered tentatively. A crystal called a sunstone, which some experiments show could find the sun through cloud by the way the light is polarised, is a different hypothesis. It is not this object. No crystal was in the layer with the oak. Two later tests are not tests of this oak. A 2014 paper calls the fragment far from optimal as a sun compass, and it reports an error of about plus or minus 4 degrees only when an artificially hidden sun stood between 10 degrees above the horizon and 8 degrees below it. A 2018 simulation of a thousand passages reaches about 92 to 100 percent success if north is reset at least every three hours, and falls under 4 percent at the summer solstice if the gap is five hours. Drift and current are left out of that model. The ships stop at night. Neither paper puts a crystal in the 1948 layer.

The picture at the top is a drawing. It makes the notches and the lines easy to see, and it can also make a reading look more certain than a worn groove is. The second picture is a modern replica, a full disc on a handle with a pin. It is useful for imagining the compass in the hand. It is not the find, which is half, handle-less, and pin-less. What this changes: if the curves really are the equinox and the near-solstice shadows at 61 degrees north, the Eastern Settlement had a wooden dial for the sun. If they are scratches that happen to be close, the ocean crossing goes back to stars, swell, and birds, and this oak is still unexplained. The last written page of the settlement, the wedding at Hvalsey, is a later century and a different argument.

Why it matters

Norse ships crossed the North Atlantic without a magnetic compass, which arrives in northern Europe later. A wooden dial that turns a shadow into a bearing would be one way they held a latitude. A token, a toy, or a counting piece would leave the crossing to wind, stars, and memory, and this oak would be a clue to something else.

The object is half a disc, oak, about 7 centimetres across, the notches making it look a little like a broken cog. It came from layers thought to be older than the convent built over them, and archaeologists placed it around the year 1200. The southern fjord sits near 60 to 61 degrees north, inside the Eastern Settlement. A sun-compass reading treats the cut curves as gnomonic lines, the path the tip of a shadow follows when a small pin, a gnomon, stands in the centre. One curve fits the equinox, when the sun rises due east and sets due west and the day is half light. Another fits a day near the summer solstice, the longest day, when the sun at this latitude climbs much higher. You would use it at sea by turning the disc until the shadow tip sits on the curve for that date. The notches then give a bearing relative to the sun, and from the sun you have a direction. A 2013 study reads some of the straighter scratches as the construction lines used to draw those curves, and it treats the piece as both a compass and a noon-shadow board, a way to know local noon and how long the noon shadow should be. A 2020 study of this disc and of two similar finds from the Baltic says the sun-compass idea is not grounded in the historical and archaeological sources, and that each disc had its own job, none of them navigation. A confession token, a memory aid for religious duties, and a toy have been suggested. The confession-token parallels are centuries later and from a Lutheran world, which sits badly with medieval Catholic Greenland, and that suggestion was published as tentative. A crystal “sunstone” that finds the sun behind cloud is a separate proposal. No such crystal was found with this wood. The replica in the gallery adds a handle, a full circle, and a pin the find does not have.

Photo tour

2 photographs, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

A drawing of the Uunartoq half-disc, notches on the rim and lines on the face. This is not the oak. Which lines are carved, and which a modern reading has emphasised, has to be checked against the wood. Praenomen3, CC BY-SA 4.0
A modern replica. It is a full circle, with a handle and a pin the find does not have. It shows one way the sun-compass reading would be held. It is not the artefact. Praenomen3, CC BY-SA 4.0

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

Open Curves that fit a latitude At about 61 degrees north the sun’s height at noon changes a great deal between March and June. A curve cut for the equinox will not fit the solstice, and the reading says both curves are on this fragment, plus scratches that are the geometry used to lay them out. The fit is the evidence. The catch is a small, broken piece of oak. A curve can be a decoration, a construction line, or damage, and still pass near a gnomonic path if you are looking for one. The drawing emphasises the lines. The wood is the test.
Open A navigator’s tool, or a token The magnetic compass is not the Norse tool of the Viking centuries. Something else steered the ships, and a sun dial is a candidate because the sun is what you have when the stars are down. The 2020 argument is that the candidate has been repeated until it looked like a fact, and that the comparable discs do not share one function. A confession token from the 17th or 18th century is a weak cousin for a 13th-century Catholic farm. A toy is always possible for a notched scrap. Possibility is not an identification.

Location and dating

Location
Uunartoq fjord, southern Greenland, in the Eastern Settlement, near 60.5 north. The pin is 60.49 north, 45.32 west, the southern fjord. A northern place spelled the same way, far up the west coast, is not this find. The convent ruin is the context. The disc came from layers below it.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision About AD 1200, the archaeological placing of the disc. The convent above those layers is later. The Eastern Settlement’s written life runs into the early 15th century, which is the Hvalsey room.
How this dating was done
Archaeological context, the lower layers under the convent, not radiocarbon printed on the oak in the sources used here. The latitude test is archaeoastronomy in the strict sense of matching a shadow curve to a known sun, and it is disputed.
What could change it
A tree-ring date or a radiocarbon date on the oak would replace “about 1200.” Another disc from a ship, rather than from under a church, would change the argument about use.
Published ranges, drawn as bars. A bar is a claim about a span, not a point.
Archaeological placingContested
1100 CE1200 CE1300 CE
  • Archaeological placing. “About 1200,” drawn as a century on either side. Not a radiocarbon result on the wood.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Is the disc a sun compass? Open. The curves can be matched to shadow paths at this latitude. A 2020 study denies the navigational function.
How would you use the curves? Open if it is a compass. A central pin’s shadow tip should fall on the curve for the date. The pin was not found in the oak.

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

A sun compass for 61 degrees north

The notches and the curves are a bearing dial. The shadow of a central pin, on the equinox and near the summer solstice, gave a Norse sailor a direction at about the latitude of the Eastern Settlement.

What supports this

  • The curves have been matched to gnomonic paths for those dates at about 61 degrees north.
  • Straight scratches can be read as the construction lines of that geometry, which would mean the curves were laid out, not doodled.
  • Norse navigation of this ocean happened, and the magnetic compass is later.

What pushes back

  • The 2020 study finds no ground in the sources for treating these discs as compasses, and gives each disc a different function.
  • The pin, the other half, and any instructions are missing. A fit can be sought until it appears.
  • The find is under a convent, not in a boat.
  • A 2014 test calls the fragment far from optimal, with an error of about plus or minus 4 degrees only for an artificially hidden sun between 10 degrees above the horizon and 8 degrees below it. That test is not a tracing of this oak.

What would settle it

It is the centre because the latitude fit is a specific, published match, not a vague “Vikings used the sun.” It moves if the curves on the wood do not actually coincide with the shadow paths once they are traced without a template.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

Not an instrument

The disc is a notched oak token, perhaps a toy or a memory aid, and the navigational curves are a modern pattern found in old scratches.

What supports this

  • A comparative study of three discs concludes that the sun-compass hypothesis is unsupported.
  • Confession tokens and toys are alternative identifications already in print, the first of them openly tentative.
  • Broken small wood from a farm has many uses that are not steered ships.

What pushes back

  • A match to two different solar dates at the right latitude is a lot for a random scratch to do.
  • The later Lutheran tokens are poor parallels for Catholic Greenland around 1200, which the suggestion itself admits.
  • “Not navigation” still has to say what the notches were for. A rejected compass is not yet an identified object.

What would settle it

It stays because the comparative study is a direct answer, not a side comment. It is not the centre while the gnomonic fit has not been shown to fail on the wood.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Open to revision

The object is a real half-disc of about AD 1200. The sun-compass reading is a precise sky hypothesis with a published rejection. Open is the state of a broken piece of oak that has been asked to explain an ocean crossing.

What drives this

  • Curves matched to the equinox and the summer solstice at about 61 degrees north.
  • A 2020 argument that these discs are not navigational.
  • No pin, no second half, and no crystal found with the wood.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

A sun compass for 61 degrees north Unsure Not an instrument

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

A sun compass used near 61 degrees north

Norse sailors in the Eastern Settlement would have carried a wooden dial that turned the sun’s height into a bearing, at least on the equinox and near midsummer.

Why it is still worth a test

A tracing of the oak, not of the drawing, tested against shadow paths at 61 degrees, and a second disc from a maritime context.

Sources

  1. An alternative interpretation of the Viking sundial artefact Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2013, equinox and solstice curves at the 61st latitude
  2. How the Vikings crossed the North Atlantic, a reinterpretation International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 2020, the case against a navigational function
  3. The Uunartoq find in a navigation discussion The 7-centimetre half-disc, the 1948 context, and the range of readings
  4. A test of the fragment as a sun compass Bernáth and others, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2014. Error of about plus or minus 4 degrees only for a hidden sun between +10 and −8 degrees of elevation. Not a test of this oak's grooves alone.
  5. A simulation of a thousand passages Száz and Horváth, Royal Society Open Science, 2018. About 92 to 100 percent if north is reset at least every three hours. Under 4 percent at the summer solstice if the gap is five hours. Drift and current omitted.

Image credits