Jordan rooms

The Nabataean capital in the sandstone of Wadi Musa, Jordan

Petra

Façades of the first centuries BCE and CE (The Treasury cuts earlier graves. The sandstone is older than either.)

Al-Khazneh, the Treasury, cut in one sandstone cliff at the mouth of the Siq. No inscription on it names the owner. Bernard Gagnon, CC BY-SA 4.0. Shown unedited.

At the end of a narrow gorge a tomb façade the height of a cliff stands clear of the sandstone, columns and urn cut from the same bed. Higher in the mountains a second front, the Monastery, repeats the idea at another scale. Other cliffs nearby were started and left, the top finished and the base barely begun.

Why this is extraordinary

Petra was the Nabataean capital, a trading city in a sandstone basin east of the Dead Sea rift. The World Heritage listing calls the rock-cut façades, among them the Khasneh, the Urn Tomb, the Palace Tomb, the Corinthian Tomb, and the Deir, an architectural ensemble of the first centuries BCE to CE. It also says the city was possible because of dams, a tunnel, channels, aqueducts, reservoirs, and cisterns that caught and steered seasonal water. The remains on the site run, in the same listing, from prehistoric times to the medieval periods. That long span is real. The great façades are the Nabataean part of it.

Al-Khazneh, the Treasury, is a tomb front cut in the cliff where the Siq opens. It carries no text that names who was buried there. An excavation of the court in front of it found older graves that the carving cut through. A handbook of the city’s history places the façade in the reigns of Obodas II or Aretas IV, from 30 BCE to 40 CE, because of those graves and the paving of the Siq. Ad Deir, the Monastery, is a larger front of the same family, higher on the mountain. No year is cut on it in the sources used here.

The order of the work is written in what was never finished. The regional authority describes a tomb on the east face of Al-Habis that was abandoned after about a quarter of the façade. The cuts run from the top downward. The tools named there are the hammer, the pick, and the chisel. From the Madbah slope, another cutting shows a court taken out of the cliff with doorways only outlined. A rock-cut face has no spare block. The unfinished tombs are the mistakes and the stops, left where they were made.

The stone is the contrast. Petra’s façades are sandstone, as at Hegra, where the same kingdom dated its inscribed tomb doors from the year 1 to 75 CE. The scratch order, and the difference between a quartz grain and a weak cement, are in the stone panel. Sheltered faces, the Treasury in its alcove among them, keep their detail. Exposed faces wear. That difference follows shelter and bedrock. It is not a second date.

The same cliffs have a sky reading, published from a 2013 survey of 50 Nabataean temples, shrines, royal tombs, and high places. Most of the bearings were taken in December 2011, with compasses corrected for the magnetic shift. The survey gives its average error as a quarter of a degree in azimuth, the compass bearing, and half a degree in the height of the horizon, which becomes about three quarters of a degree in declination. Declination is how far a rising or a setting sits from the celestial equator, so cliffs in different valleys can be compared. The directions bunch near the equinoxes, the days when night and day are about equal, at a peak around 0 degrees of declination, and near the solstices, the days when the sun's rising and setting stop and turn back. One solstice peak sits near 24 and a quarter degrees, and another near minus 25 and a quarter. A further peak near 8 degrees has no simple star or sun to match. Due-north bearings also pile up, which can happen because many horizons share the same northern declination even when nobody aimed.

At Ad Deir, the Monastery, winter-solstice sunset sends light through the door onto the inner platform, the motab, where the sacred stones would have stood. The light holds for about a week on either side of that day. From the same platform the sun sets against a rock the survey reads as a lion's head, and the lion is an animal of Al Uzza. Two thousand years ago the sun's northern rim at midwinter stood near 23 and a half degrees, so the effect would have been tighter then. Al Uzza, "the Most Powerful", is read as the evening star, the planet Venus. Dushara, the chief god, whose name means "He of Shara", the range east of the city, is read as a sky god, solar or lunar, and also as a god of the dead. One ancient report of Nabataean worship names the winter sun. An older Greek notice says they worshipped the sun on the roofs of their houses.

The Urn Tomb is the other measured door. Its gate is centred on equinox sunset over the mountain Umm al-Biyara, between two notches on the summit, and the same hall is argued to take summer-solstice sunset and winter-solstice sunset on further notches of that western skyline. On 21 December 2011 the last light of the winter solstice, watched from the court, reached the northeast corner of the inner hall. The Treasury, Al-Khazneh, looks out through the Siq at a slice of sky only about 18 degrees high, which cuts off a solar line. A lunar reading of that façade has been suggested, and it has not been shown. A southern peak near the star Canopus faded when the same bearings were set against a random spread of directions, so that one match is the weak one.

The catch is that a cliff already facing west will see some sunset, and a door cut for a tomb can inherit the way the rock happens to face. The water system and the unfinished tops do not need a solstice. The sky reading and the mason's reading use the same valley, and neither one has to lose for the other to stay.

One reading places the great façades in the Nabataean centuries without a year on the Treasury door, because the door cuts graves of that same age and matches a dated series at Hegra. A reading that puts the fronts much earlier would have to explain those graves, the unfinished tops, and the water system of the same centuries. Both readings are still live, and they use the same valley. The prehistoric and medieval remains are a different fact. They are the long life of the valley, and they are not asked to be the signature on the Treasury.

Why it matters

If the unfinished tombs show a planned order, the finished fronts are the same craft carried through, in a stone an iron pick can cut. If the façades are older than the Nabataean city, the graves under the Treasury and the dates on the sister tombs at Hegra are the evidence that has to be answered. Weathering on an open cliff is not that answer by itself.

The Siq is the natural cleft that leads in from the east. A crowstep is the squared crown also used at Hegra. The Treasury and the Monastery use classical orders instead, still cut from the top of a single face. The water works are dams, a diversion tunnel, and channels, not an afterthought.

Photo tour

5 photographs, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

Al-Khazneh, the Treasury, cut in one sandstone cliff at the mouth of the Siq. No inscription on it names the owner. Bernard Gagnon, CC BY-SA 4.0
From Jabal al-Madbah, a court taken out of the cliff. The doorways are outlines. The design is started, not finished. Michael Gunther, CC BY-SA 3.0
Ad Deir, the Monastery. The same idea as the Treasury, higher on the mountain, with no year cut on it in the sources used here. Bernard Gagnon, CC BY-SA 3.0
A channel along the Siq. The gorge is natural. The conduit is built. Michael Gunther, CC BY-SA 3.0
The Siq, the natural cleft, with the path running between the walls. The Treasury is not at the far opening in this frame.Diego Delso, CC BY-SA 3.0

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

Observed — the sequence is published; a duration is not Cut from the top, and left unfinished The authority’s account of the Unfinished Tomb on Al-Habis says about a quarter of the façade was cut, from the top down, with hammer, pick, and chisel, and that a ledge of stone was left as the working platform. It offers geology, money, or the death of the patron as reasons for the stop, and heads the monument with a window of about 50 BCE to 50 CE. A second photograph, from the Madbah slope, shows another court carved out and doorways only blocked in. Neither face can be patched with a replacement block. Stopping is the correction the cliff still shows. No source used here prints how many years a finished front took. Michael Gunther, CC BY-SA 3.0. Shown unedited.
Open — the window is published; the name is not The Treasury, over older graves Al-Khazneh has no inscription that names its dead. The excavation in its court found graves the façade later cut, their upper parts knocked down to make the terrace. The handbook places the monument in the reigns of Obodas II or Aretas IV, 30 BCE to 40 CE. A tighter guess inside that window is one reading, not a line on the stone. The older layer under this particular front is those graves, decades older than the façade, not a different civilization. Ad Deir repeats the cliff-front at a larger scale and, in the sources used here, without a year of its own. Bernard Gagnon, CC BY-SA 3.0. Shown unedited.
Observed Water, steered around the façades The listing names a diversion dam, the Muthlim tunnel, channels, aqueducts, reservoirs, and cisterns, and dates that engineering to the same first centuries BCE to CE as the façades. The visitor authority describes a dam at the mouth of the Siq and a tunnel cut to turn floodwater aside. A channel still runs along the gorge wall. The façades did not stand in an unmanaged wadi. The water system is part of how the cutting was protected and how the city drank. It is Nabataean hydraulic work in the published reading, not a later coat of pipes on an older monument. Michael Gunther, CC BY-SA 3.0. Shown unedited.
Open Sandstone, and no room to hide a slip Hegra, in the same kingdom, is the dated sandstone parallel, years 1 to 75 CE on its inscribed doors. At Petra the correction for a bad cut was to stop or to avoid a weak bed. The authority says geology itself halted some tombs. A finished façade shows the beds the masons accepted. It does not show a patch, because there is no patch once the face has been cut down.

Location and dating

Location
Petra, Wadi Musa, southern Jordan. The pin is the archaeological city. The Treasury stands at the inner end of the Siq. The Monastery is higher, to the northwest.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision The listing’s façade ensemble is the first centuries BCE to CE. The Treasury’s published window is 30 BCE to 40 CE, from the graves it cut. The Al-Habis unfinished tomb is headed 50 BCE to 50 CE. Roman annexation of the kingdom is 106 CE, which is later than these fronts.
How this dating was done
The Treasury window is stratigraphy, the order of layers, read from graves the carving destroyed and set against the reigns. The façade itself carries no inscription. The ensemble date is typology, dating by the look of the work, set beside the dated tombs at Hegra. The unfinished tomb’s window is the authority’s heading. Radiocarbon, the carbon-decay clock, has not been run on the sandstone. The listing’s prehistoric-to-medieval span dates other remains in the same landscape.
What could change it
An inscription on the Treasury naming an owner would replace the reign window with a text. A published log of one façade, tools and days, would turn the “iron and sandstone” account into a rate.
Published ranges, drawn as bars. A bar is a claim about a span, not a point.
Treasury, published window
Façade ensemble
100 BCE1 CE100 CE
  • Treasury, published window. Reigns of Obodas II and Aretas IV, from graves the façade cut. Not a line carved on the monument.
  • Façade ensemble. The listing’s first centuries BCE to CE. Wider than the Treasury window.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Which weak bed, if any, stopped the Al-Habis façade? Open — geology is one of the authority’s three suggestions
Can the graves under the Treasury be tied to a published pottery plate, tomb by tomb? Open — the handbook treats them as decisive; the plates are not reprinted here

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

The current narrative

Nabataean masons cut the façades from the top down in the first centuries BCE and CE, with iron picks in the local sandstone, and built dams and channels in the same centuries. The Treasury was cut over graves of that age. Unfinished tombs are abandoned jobs, not the ruins of an older people.

What supports this

  • The Al-Habis tomb shows the top begun and the rest left, with the tools named.
  • Graves under the Treasury are earlier than the façade and still inside the Nabataean centuries. Hegra’s inscribed doors of the same kingdom run from the year 1 to 75 CE.
  • The listing dates the water system with the façades.

What pushes back

  • The Treasury and the Monastery have no year of their own, so their place in the window is an argument from context.
  • No published crew has cut a front of this size and filed the days, so the claim that iron and time were enough is untimed.

What would settle it

Context, unfinished work, and the sister site carry the date. The missing log does not open a different century.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

An older layer of façades

The great fronts were cut long before the Nabataean kingdom, and the Nabataeans inherited them, adding graves, channels, or inscriptions to a city they did not carve.

What supports this

  • The listing records remains from prehistoric times through the medieval periods, so the valley was not empty before the tomb century.
  • Some façades are badly worn, and a worn cliff can look older than a sheltered one.
  • The Treasury’s own door has no name and no year.

What pushes back

  • The older material under the Treasury is a set of graves the façade destroyed, dated by pottery to the decades before the carving, not to a lost age.
  • Unfinished tombs use the same orders and stop mid-cut. An inherited monument does not need a quarry still in progress in the Nabataean manner.
  • Differential wear matches a sandstone the Hegra studies already call uneven, and it matches shelter. The Treasury, protected in the alcove, is the sharp one.

What would settle it

The long occupation of the valley should stay in view. It does not move the façades out of the Nabataean window the graves and the unfinished work support.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Consensus holds well

Keep the façades in the first centuries BCE and CE. The older layer excavation has produced, under the Treasury, is Nabataean graves the carving cut. Keep prehistoric and later remains as other chapters on the same ground. Keep the sandstone as the soft contrast with volcanic rock, and the unfinished tombs as the proof that a slip was left, not patched.

What drives this

  • The unfinished façades show top-down cutting with pick and chisel.
  • The Treasury cuts dated-by-pottery graves of the decades before it.
  • Hegra’s inscriptions date the same kingdom’s sandstone tombs.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

The current narrative Unsure An older layer of façades

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

The current narrative

Petra is a Nabataean sandstone workshop with a water system of the same age. The open number is the time one façade took.

Why it is still worth a test

Publish the days and the tools for a cutting on this sandstone, and the pottery plates for each grave under the Treasury.

An older layer of façades

The graves, the unfinished tops, and the Hegra dates would all have to be re-read as reuse of a much earlier front.

Why it is still worth a test

A layer, a tool mark, or a sealed deposit that puts the Treasury face before the graves it cuts. The excavation so far says the opposite.

Sources

  1. Petra UNESCO. The façade ensemble of the first centuries BCE to CE, and the dams, tunnel, channels, and cisterns.
  2. The Unfinished Tomb Petra Development and Tourism Region Authority. About a quarter of a façade on Al-Habis, cut from the top with hammer, pick, and chisel.
  3. Historical note on the Unfinished Tomb The same authority. A heading of about 50 BCE to 50 CE for that tomb.
  4. Petra in the Nabataean, Roman, and Byzantine periods The Treasury dated by graves it cut, in the reigns of Obodas II and Aretas IV.
  5. Inside Petra, the Siq dam and tunnel Visitor authority. A dam at the entrance of the Siq and a tunnel to turn floodwater aside.
  6. Hegra, the dated sandstone parallel Inscribed Nabataean tombs from the years 1 to 75 CE. The sister workshop, not a second Petra.
  7. Mohs scale of mineral hardness Quartz at 7, iron at 4, copper at 2.5 to 3, brass at 3. Not a scratch test of the Treasury’s bed.
  8. The Siq, geology of the sandstone Jordan Journal of History and Archaeology, 2012. Umm Ishrin quartz sandstone cemented mostly by iron oxides, not well cemented, and relatively soft to carve. Disi sandstone, with minor clay cement, holds only a few monuments.
  9. An iron pick from an unfinished tomb Syria, 2001. A double-pointed iron pick, 32.6 centimetres long, left in an unfinished tomb on the east flank of Al-Habis.

Image credits