Myanmar rooms

Near Ywangan, Shan State, Myanmar

Padah-Lin

Charcoal from about 13,000 to 1,750 years ago (the red paintings are not dated on the pigment)

Cupules, small round pits, in the rock of Padah-Lin Cave 1. A wet green patch sits among them. This frame is the pitted stone, not the red paintings of animals and hands. Comtebenoit, CC BY-SA 4.0. Shown unedited.

Padah-Lin’s open shelter has red paintings of hands, animals, and a sun on the ceiling between two lines, read as the view out of the cave. The charcoal in the floor runs from about 13,000 years ago to about 1,750. The paint itself has no date.

Why this is extraordinary

Two caves face south near Ywangan, about 200 yards apart. The western one is a deep limestone system, on the order of 800 feet of linked caverns, dark except where holes in the roof let the day in. The eastern one, Cave 1, is a rock shelter, 30 to 40 feet deep, open to the light. In 1969 a dig in that shelter found stone tools, bone, charcoal, and pieces of red ochre. More than 1,600 stone artefacts came out of the work that followed, choppers and flakes and a few partly ground tools, including a crude shouldered adze and ring-stones. The photograph is a different marking on the same shelter’s rock: cupules, small pits hammered into the wall. Later recording put more than 300 cupules in Cave 1. They are not the paintings.

The paintings are on the middle of a wall that juts into the shelter, above ordinary reach, in red ochre. About a dozen figures are still distinct. Two at the west are human hands, one with concentric circles in the palm and one that looks like a skull. On a smooth part of the ceiling is a sun between two irregular lines that converge. The rest are animals: bulls, each with a calf at the heels, bison, a deer, the hindquarters of elephants, and a large fish. The excavation report reads the ceiling sun as the view from inside the shelter, the sun appearing between the brow of the cave and a distant ridge. That is a picture of a sight, not a measured azimuth. The shelter faces south. The report does not print a degree for the painted sun or for the mouth. How you would check the reading is to stand under the ceiling and look out, and see whether those two lines match the brow and the ridge. The report says they do. It does not give the angle.

The date splits. The report called the culture early Neolithic, a transition from flaked tools to grinding, comparable to the Hoabinhian and Bacsonian of mainland Southeast Asia, and it treated the paintings as the same age because ground ochre and unground lumps lay with the tools. Calcium on some figures was used as a sign that the paint is not modern: the drip is slow, and the report guessed it had taken at least a century, which is a floor, not a Pleistocene age. Radiocarbon on charcoal and bone from the shelter then showed occupation from the late Pleistocene, with results between about 1,750 and about 13,000 years before present, and a maximum near 13,400 has also been cited. A terminal date near 6,500 before present has been offered for the Hoabinhian-like industry. Later comment says the tools sit more comfortably with the late Pleistocene than with a Neolithic label. The paint has never been dated on the pigment. The ochre in the soil is the bridge. A bridge can be the painter’s palette and it can be colour from a later visit in a cave people used into recent times.

The deep western cave is not this argument. A later dig there, and at another cave nearby, has been reported with older deposits. Those holes do not date the red wall in the shelter. The Pyu cities are a different millennium and a different kind of brick. No second sky reading, beyond the ceiling sun as a view from the mouth, is published in the sources used here.

Why it matters

If the paintings belong with the oldest charcoal, they are late Pleistocene pictures, and the Neolithic label was the tools’ mixed look. If they belong with the ochre only as a shared colour, they could be any century of a cave that people kept entering.

The photograph is the cupules in the shelter rock. The red figures are described from the dig report. The two clocks are the argument.

Photo tour

1 photograph, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

Cupules, small round pits, in the rock of Padah-Lin Cave 1. A wet green patch sits among them. This frame is the pitted stone, not the red paintings of animals and hands. Comtebenoit, CC BY-SA 4.0

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

Open A sun between two lines The ceiling picture is a disc between converging lines. The report reads it as the sun seen from inside, between the cave brow and a ridge. That is a view, observed by looking out. No azimuth is printed. A disc can be a sun and it can be a mark. The lines are what make the view reading specific.
Open Ochre in the soil, paint on the wall Ground red ochre with the tools is why the report ties the paintings to the dig. The pigment on the wall was not dated. People used the shelter from the late Pleistocene into recent centuries, on the charcoal range of about 13,000 to 1,750 years before present. A palette and a painting can be the same visit or two visits that both liked red.
Open Neolithic, or late Pleistocene tools Flaked choppers and a few ground pieces in one soil were read as an early Neolithic transition, with a Hoabinhian parallel and a suggested end near 6,500 years before present. Later comment puts the same tools with the late Pleistocene. Both readings use the tools. They do not date the paint.

Location and dating

Location
Near Ywangan, southern Shan State. The published coordinate is only to a tenth of a degree, 21.1 north and 96.3 east, and the pin is that point. The two caves are about 200 yards apart. Cave 1 is the shelter with the paintings.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision Occupation from the late Pleistocene into recent times on the charcoal, about 13,000 to 1,750 years before present. The paintings are called Neolithic in the dig report and left undated on the pigment.
How this dating was done
Radiocarbon on charcoal and bone from the shelter floor. The paintings are tied to that floor by pieces of ochre and by the report’s reading of the style, not by a date on the paint.
What could change it
A date on the organic binder in the red pigment, if any binder survives, would put the sun and the bulls on a number of their own.
Published ranges, drawn as bars. A bar is a claim about a span, not a point.
Charcoal and bone in the shelterContested
11050 BCE5000 BCE200 CE
  • Charcoal and bone in the shelter. About 13,000 to 1,750 years before present. A maximum near 13,400 has also been cited. The bar is the occupation, not a date on the paint. The recent end reaches into the common era only as a round of 1,750 before 1950.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Are the paintings as old as the oldest charcoal? Open. The ochre in the soil is the link. The pigment on the wall is undated, and the cave was used for a long time after 13,000 years ago.
Is the ceiling mark the view out? Open. The report says the two lines are the brow and the ridge. It does not print an angle.

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

Neolithic paintings, as the dig report had them

The paintings are the work of the shelter’s early Neolithic occupants, the people of the flaked and partly ground tools, because the ochre is in their soil.

What supports this

  • The report ties pigment, tools, and pictures in one homogeneous deposit and compares the industry to the Hoabinhian.
  • A suggested end near 6,500 years before present gives that industry a closing date younger than the oldest charcoal.
  • The ceiling sun is described as a view the painters could take from inside, which fits people living in the shelter.

What pushes back

  • The same deposit’s charcoal reaches about 13,000 years, which is Pleistocene, and later comment says the tools look it.
  • “Homogeneous” is the report’s word for a soil that the dates show was used for a very long time.
  • The sun reading does not date the picture. A view can be painted in any century the mouth had the same shape.

What would settle it

It is the centre only as the report’s own conclusion, the one the ochre was asked to carry. The charcoal range is why that conclusion is contested. The paintings stay undated either way.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

Late Pleistocene pictures, with the early tools

The paintings belong with the late Pleistocene occupation, around the older charcoal, and the Neolithic label was a name for a mixed toolkit that had not yet been dated.

What supports this

  • Charcoal and bone reach about 13,000 years before present, and a later comment prefers a late Pleistocene reading of the tools.
  • Ochre, ground and raw, lay with those tools, which is a painter’s material in the same soil.
  • The figures are above easy modern reach, and dripstone covers some of them.

What pushes back

  • The paint was not dated. The dripstone argument in the report was “at least a century,” which almost any old paint would satisfy.
  • The shelter was used into recent millennia, so red can be late.
  • Hands and animals are a habit across many ages. They do not pick 13,000 years by style alone.

What would settle it

It is a fair reading of the old charcoal and a weak reading of the paint. The ochre is the only bridge, and a bridge of colour is not a date.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Open to revision

A painted shelter, cupules, and charcoal from about 13,000 to 1,750 years ago are firm. The red figures, including the ceiling sun, have no date on the pigment. Neolithic and late Pleistocene are both readings of the tools. The sun is a view from the mouth in the report, with no azimuth.

What drives this

  • About a dozen red figures, hands, animals, and a ceiling sun between two lines.
  • Ochre with the tools, and no date on the paint.
  • Charcoal from about 13,000 to 1,750 years before present, and more than 300 cupules.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

Late Pleistocene pictures, with the early tools Unsure Neolithic paintings, as the dig report had them

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

The paintings are as old as the oldest charcoal

The bulls, the hands, and the ceiling sun would be late Pleistocene pictures, and the Neolithic label would not cover them.

Why it is still worth a test

A date on the pigment, or a painted flake buried in the layer that produced the 13,000-year charcoal.

The ceiling sun is the view out of the mouth

The painters recorded a sight they had, the sun between brow and ridge. That can be true in more than one century.

Why it is still worth a test

A measured match between the two painted lines and the real brow and ridge, with an azimuth. The report describes the match and does not print the angle.

Sources

  1. The “Neolithic” culture of the Padah-lin caves Asian Perspectives
  2. Rock art research in Southeast Asia Arts

Image credits