Puerto Rico rooms

Sorcé, Vieques, and Punta Candelero, Humacao, Puerto Rico

La Hueca

About 160 BC to AD 500 in one filing (a separate migration, or a Saladoid style)

The shore at Punta Candelero, Humacao, one of the two type places. The beach in this frame shows no pottery and no trench. The deposit is not the sand a swimmer sees. Yarfpr, CC BY-SA 4.0. Shown unedited.

At Sorcé, on Vieques, and at Punta Candelero, opposite on the main island, excavators found a ceramic package that is not the painted Saladoid ware long taught as the first pottery in Puerto Rico. One reading makes it a separate people, Huecoid, a little earlier, from the northwest of South America rather than the Orinoco. Another files the same material as a Saladoid subseries, La Hueca, flourishing from about 160 BC to AD 500. The layers put Huecoid material underneath or beside the Saladoid, which is why “a style” and “a migration” are both still in print.

Why this is extraordinary

For a long time the first pottery in Puerto Rico was Saladoid, a tradition named on the Orinoco, painted and modelled, with farmers who liked land crabs enough that an early digger called them the crab culture. Then the trenches at Sorcé, on the south side of Vieques, in the sector known as La Hueca, turned up a package the excavators would not file with that ware. Less of the white-on-red painting, a different way of modelling the clay, a different set of ornaments and stones. Across the water, at Punta Candelero in Humacao, the same package appeared. One summary says the later Saladoid group called Hacienda Grande did live at La Hueca, but only afterward, and never settled Candelero at all.

Two filings use those sherds. The excavators’ filing says this is a separate culture, Huecoid, a little older, and not from the Orinoco. They point the route toward the northwest of South America, and they note that wherever the two are found together the Huecoid material is in the deeper layer or off to the side, at Sorcé, at Candelero, and at north-coast sites such as Hacienda Grande. Depth is time if nobody has dug a later pit through an earlier camp. A museum filing, the one a visitor meets in a catalogue, calls La Hueca a local subseries of the Saladoid and gives it about 160 BC to AD 500. A subseries is a variant, not a second people. The bracket overlaps the centuries of early Saladoid life rather than sitting cleanly before them. So the calendar a reference book prints and the sequence a trench describes are not yet the same argument.

The catch is what a difference is allowed to prove. Pots change. A new migration is a heavier claim than a new fashion, and it wants a gap in years, not only a gap in paint. Beside the catalogue bracket of about 160 BC to AD 500, a 2023 model runs from the 2nd century calibrated BC to the 16th century calibrated AD, with larger peaks about 120–400, 620–820, and 1270–1400. The study says the style seems to predate a neighbouring style by at least a century where sterile sand separates them, and then says the order remains open. It prints the ways the long span could be wrong: sampling bias, contamination, or a sound early group followed by a bad late group. A style stretched to the sixteenth century is a poor clock either for one early people or for a short local accent. The layers remain. No star, no solstice, and no bearing of a house row is published for Sorcé or for Candelero. The sky reading of a Puerto Rican ceremonial centre, the equinox and the sight toward the north star, belongs to the ball courts at Caguana, which are later than these sherds.

The photograph is the beach at Punta Candelero. People, palms, and the reef. It is the place name. It is not a sherd, and the pin is an approximate point for that headland, not a corner of the trench. What this changes: if Huecoid is a separate earlier arrival, Puerto Rico’s first ceramic villages are not one arrow from the Orinoco. If it is a Saladoid style, the island keeps a single tradition with a strong local accent between about 160 BC and AD 500. The layers are what would decide, once they have dates of their own.

Why it matters

The first potters of Puerto Rico are the start of village life in the islands. One migration from the Orinoco is a single arrow on the map. A second, earlier arrow from another part of the continent is a different peopling. The sherds are the same sherds. The argument is whether difference of style, in an earlier layer, is difference of people.

Saladoid pottery, named from the Orinoco, is the painted and modelled ware long treated as the first ceramic of the Antilles, with agriculture and a taste for land crabs that once earned it the nickname crab culture. At Sorcé, in the sector called La Hueca, a programme of the University of Puerto Rico found a different set: modelled vessels, a fondness for certain stones and ornaments, and a reluctance, in the published contrast, to the white-on-red painting and the incised designs filled with white paste that mark Saladoid ceremony pots. Punta Candelero, at Humacao, produced the same component, and it has been said that the later Hacienda Grande people, a Saladoid group, lived at La Hueca only afterward and did not settle Candelero at all. The British Museum’s summary files La Hueca as a local variation, a subseries, of the Saladoid, from about 160 BC to AD 500. The excavators’ summary files a distinct culture, earlier than the Saladoid, with roots toward the northwest of South America and the Andes rather than the Orinoco, passing sites such as Río Guapo in Venezuela. Deposits that have been dug sit either off to the side of Saladoid middens or in the deeper layers, at Sorcé, Candelero, Hacienda Grande, and other north-coast sites. A deeper layer is earlier if the ground was not later mixed. No azimuth and no star are published for either site. The ball courts and the equinox row are a different, later architecture, already the subject of the Caguana room.

Photo tour

1 photograph, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

The shore at Punta Candelero, Humacao, one of the two type places. The beach in this frame shows no pottery and no trench. The deposit is not the sand a swimmer sees. Yarfpr, CC BY-SA 4.0

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

Open A style, or a people Pottery can change without a new migration. A subseries is the word for a variant inside a tradition. The Huecoid claim is that the variant is too thorough, and too consistently earlier, to be a fashion. Ornaments and the choice of stone are part of that thoroughness, not the pot alone. The reply is that early Saladoid is already various, and that filing the variety as a second people multiplies migrations the dates do not yet separate cleanly.
Open Underneath is earlier At the dug sites the Huecoid material is in the deeper layers or in deposits kept apart horizontally from Saladoid ones. Depth is time if the layers are intact. A crab-rich Saladoid midden dug into an older camp can also put two traditions in a stack that looks like a sequence. The report from Candelero, that Hacienda Grande people never settled there, is the cleanest case of a place with one package and not the other. It is one site.

Location and dating

Location
Sorcé, on the south side of Vieques, is the type site. Punta Candelero, Humacao, is the twin on the main island. The pin is 18.15 north, 65.80 west, a point for Candelero, approximate. The photograph is that shore. Vieques lies east of it.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision One published bracket is about 160 BC to AD 500, as a Saladoid subseries. A 2023 model, beside it, runs from the 2nd century calibrated BC to the 16th century calibrated AD. The separate-people reading makes the same material earlier than the Saladoid layers it underlies where sterile sand separates them, and the 2023 study says that order remains open.
How this dating was done
Stratigraphy and typology, and a 2023 radiocarbon model. The 160 BC to AD 500 bracket is a museum summary of the culture’s flourish. The model’s long span is a different clock, with the authors’ own warnings about bias, contamination, and a bad late group.
What could change it
A radiocarbon series on short-lived material from a Huecoid layer and from the Saladoid layer above it, at the same site, would show the gap, if there is one, in years.
Published ranges, drawn as bars. A bar is a claim about a span, not a point.
Museum bracket for La HuecaContested
160 BCE250 CE500 CE
  • Museum bracket for La Hueca. About 160 BC to AD 500, filed as a Saladoid subseries. Not the excavators’ only reading.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Is Huecoid a second people? Open. The pots and ornaments differ. A subseries can differ without a second homeland.
Are the deeper layers earlier? Open. That is the stratigraphic claim. Mixing, or a later pit, is the catch.

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

A Saladoid style, about 160 BC to AD 500

La Hueca is a local subseries of the Saladoid tradition, not a separate migration, and it flourished between about 160 BC and AD 500.

What supports this

  • A standard museum filing puts it inside the Saladoid as a variation, with that bracket.
  • Early ceramic cultures in the islands are already sorted into styles without each style being a new people.
  • Shared village life, crops, and some potting habits keep Huecoid and Saladoid in one broad arrival from South America.

What pushes back

  • The excavators list differences in modelling, paint, and ornaments that they consider too large for a subseries.
  • The material lies under or beside Saladoid deposits, which a mere variant does not have to do.
  • Candelero is published as a place the later Saladoid group did not occupy.

What would settle it

It is the centre in many reference works, which is why the bracket 160 BC to AD 500 is the date a visitor will meet first. It moves if the deeper layers are dated earlier by a clear gap, and the ornament set still refuses the Orinoco styles.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

An earlier Huecoid migration

Huecoid people reached Puerto Rico before the Saladoid, from the northwest of South America rather than the Orinoco, and the deeper deposits are theirs.

What supports this

  • Sorcé and Candelero were published as a component unlike the painted Saladoid ware.
  • Where both occur, Huecoid material is lower or laterally separate.
  • Similar material has been pointed to on the Venezuelan coast and in the Lesser Antilles as a route.

What pushes back

  • The 160 BC to AD 500 bracket overlaps the early Saladoid rather than clearly preceding it. The 2023 model stretches the style to the sixteenth century, which is a poor clock for one early people, and the authors say the order against the neighbouring style remains open.
  • A homeland in the Andes is a long step from a sherd in Humacao, and the sources used here do not print a radiocarbon chain along that route.
  • Style difference plus depth is necessary for a second people. It is not sufficient if the layers are mixed.

What would settle it

It stays because the stratigraphy was the reason the component was separated, and that separation has been defended for decades. It is not the centre in the reference filing that still calls La Hueca a Saladoid subseries.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Open to revision

The pots are real and they are not identical to classic Saladoid painted wares. Whether that makes a second migration is the published split, and the only calendar bracket in front of a visitor, about 160 BC to AD 500, belongs to the subseries filing. Open keeps both.

What drives this

  • A distinct ceramic and ornament package at Sorcé and Candelero.
  • Deeper or separate deposits relative to Saladoid layers.
  • A reference bracket of about 160 BC to AD 500 that calls the same material a Saladoid subseries.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

A Saladoid style, about 160 BC to AD 500 Unsure An earlier Huecoid migration

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

A second, earlier ceramic migration into Puerto Rico

The first pottery and villages on the island would not be a single Orinoco arrival, and the Saladoid would be the next people, not the first.

Why it is still worth a test

Paired radiocarbon dates on the Huecoid layer and the Saladoid layer at one site, with the ornaments counted in both.

Sources

  1. La Hueca culture, collection note British Museum, the subseries filing and the bracket about 160 BC to AD 500
  2. The La Hueca problem, in the St. Martin excavations Leiden University, the separation of La Hueca from later Hacienda Grande
  3. Saladoides y huecoides A published contrast of the two packages and their layers
  4. A Bayesian chronology of precolonial Puerto Rico PLOS ONE, 22 February 2023. La Hueca from the 2nd century calibrated BC to the 16th century calibrated AD, peaks about 120–400, 620–820, and 1270–1400. Order against the neighbouring style remains open.

Image credits