Near Bulathsinhala, Sri Lanka
Fa-Hien Lena
About 48,000 to 34,000 years ago (bone points read as arrows, and as spear tips)
One hundred and thirty bone points from Fa-Hien Lena, in layers of about 48,000 to 34,000 years ago, are read as arrowheads for hunting monkeys in the rainforest. A published comment calls that suggestive, and offers a fishing spear, because fish bones are in the same ground.
Why this is extraordinary
Fa-Hien Lena, also called Pahiyangala, is a cave in the wet-zone forest near Bulathsinhala. The occupation comes in four phases. Phase D is the late Pleistocene, about 48,000 to 34,000 calibrated years before present, probably several short stays. One date falls outside the phases, 29,120 to 27,870. Phase C is about 13,000 to 12,000, phase B about 8,700 to 8,000, and phase A about 6,000 to 4,000. A chronology built from 30 radiocarbon dates replaced an older working age of about 38,000 years for the earliest use. The cliff in the photograph is the place. The mouth is a shelter in that rock, not a separate monument the picture picks out.
In those layers, 130 points made on monkey long bone match the size, the weight, and the wear of projectile tips. Twenty-four are unipoints, 18.4 percent. Eighteen are bipoints, 13.8 percent. Two are geometric, 1.5 percent. Eighty-six, 66.1 percent, are fragments with manufacturing traces and impact breaks, too incomplete to class. Notches at the middle of the unipoints, and on some bipoints, are read as the mark of a binding to a shaft. The shaft is inferred to be thinner than a centimetre, from a median width of 3.5 millimetres at the base. One point carries grooves read as decoration or as a hold for poison. The points were made in the cave: blanks, unfinished pieces, and waste are in every phase. Prime-aged adult monkeys are the prey the teeth suggest, which is a pattern a trap, taking animals as they come, does not usually leave.
The study’s conclusion is the bow and arrow, from at least 48,000 to 34,000 calibrated years before present. Blowgun darts are set aside because the points are too short, too heavy, and hafted, while a dart has to be long and light enough to seal in the tube. A single-pointed spear is set aside because the points are too small. A multipronged spear is the size they would fit, and the study says that weapon needs a long arcing throw which closed forest does not allow. The same paragraph says that wear alone cannot yet tell an arrow from a spear. The size, the hafting, the impact chips, and the forest are asked to do that work together.
A published comment calls the arrow reading suggestive and not definitive. Fish bones are in the same sediments, and a multipronged spear, thrown or thrust at fish, is the alternative that comment offers. Another comment asks for scans of the inside of the points, the method that made a South African bone point older than 60,000 years readable as an arrow, before the surface chips are treated as settled high-speed damage. The study and the comments are the two sides. No azimuth of the shelter, and no star, is published for this cave. The Sigiriya zenith sun is a different hill and a different millennium.
Why it matters
If they are arrows, a bow was in use in a tropical forest at the early end of our species’ time in this island. If they are spear prongs, the same points are a different weapon, and the bow arrives later than this layer.
The photograph is the cliff. The points are small, bone, and not in the picture. The bow and the fishing spear are the argument.
Photo tour
1 photograph, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.
- The bone points are not in the cliff photograph, and the shelter mouth is not isolated in the frame.
What is still unexplained
These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.
Location and dating
- Location
- Fa-Hien Lena, Pahiyangala, near Bulathsinhala in the wet zone. The pin is the cave. The cliff photograph does not isolate the mouth.
- Period label
- Current consensus — open to revision Phase D, about 48,000 to 34,000 calibrated years before present, is the early occupation and the one the arrow argument uses. Later phases run to about 4,000. An older account of the cave used about 38,000 years.
- How this dating was done
- Radiocarbon on the layers, 30 dates in the revised sequence. The points are dated by the layer they were found in. The weapon type is wear, size, and comparison, not a clock.
- What could change it
- A scan of the inside of a phase D point, or a direct date on one complete unipoint, would tie the damage to a year and show whether the chips are the high-speed kind.
What is actually there
- Of 130 bone points, 24 are unipoints, 18 are bipoints, 2 are geometrics, and 86 are fragments.
- All are on monkey long bone. Median width at the base is 3.5 millimetres.
- One point has grooves read as decoration or as a hold for poison.
- The study says wear alone cannot tell an arrow from a spear.
- No azimuth of the shelter is published.
Open questions
| Question | Status |
|---|---|
| Arrow or fishing spear? | Open. The study uses size, hafting, monkeys, and the forest. The comment uses the fish bones and asks for a scan. |
| Are the points as old as phase D? | Open as a group. The layers are dated. Each point is dated by the layer, not by its own collagen. |
The current narrative
Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.
The current narrative — open to revision
A bow in the rainforest by about 48,000 years ago
The bone points are arrowheads, hafted to thin shafts and used on monkeys, from about 48,000 to 34,000 calibrated years before present.
What supports this
- Notches, a base around 3.5 millimetres, and impact chips match a light hafted point.
- They are too small for a single heavy spear and too short and heavy for a blowgun dart, on the study’s criteria.
- Prime-aged monkeys fit a weapon that picks a target in the canopy, more than a trap.
What pushes back
- The study itself says wear alone cannot separate arrow from spear.
- Fish bones keep a pronged fishing spear available.
- The age is the layer’s age. A shifted point would not stay in phase D.
What would settle it
It is the centre the 2020 study argues, with the forest and the size doing the work the wear cannot finish. The fishing spear is why the centre is not a closed case.
Emerging narratives
Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.
An emerging narrative
Spear prongs, including for fish
The points tipped multipronged spears, thrown or thrust, and the fish in the sediments are the prey that makes that weapon ordinary.
What supports this
- The study allows that the size matches a multipronged spear, and rules that spear out by the forest, not by the shape.
- Fish remains are in the cave.
- A request for internal scans is a way of saying the surface chips are not yet the high-speed proof.
What pushes back
- Closed forest is a poor place for the long arc a pronged throwing spear needs, which is the study’s answer.
- Monkey bones, and prime-aged adults among them, are what the hunting argument is built on.
- Blowguns and single spears are the alternatives the measurements fit least well.
What would settle it
A spear is the live alternative, especially for the fish. It has to explain the monkeys and the tight forest. It is the comment the study’s own sentence about wear leaves open.
Should the current view be reevaluated?
Open to revision
A large set of small hafted bone points in layers of about 48,000 to 34,000 years is firm. Calling them arrows is the study’s conclusion and, in print, still suggestive. Fish, forest, and the limits of surface wear are the other side. No sky reading is published for the shelter.
What drives this
- 130 points, a 3.5-millimetre median base, and one point with grooves.
- Phase D at about 48,000 to 34,000 calibrated years before present, from a 30-date sequence.
- A published comment that prefers a fishing spear until the inside of the points is scanned.
This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.
Weigh it yourself
Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.
Visitor lean so far — not evidence. On this browser only; a shared tally is not collected.
If the contested reading is right
What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.
They are arrows
Bow-hunting in a tropical forest would be this early on the island, aimed at monkeys in the canopy.
Why it is still worth a test
Internal scans of phase D points, compared with the damage used on the South African point older than 60,000 years.
They are fishing spears
The bow would not be required by this layer, and the rainforest innovation would be a pronged spear for water as well as for trees.
Why it is still worth a test
A separation of points found with fish bone from points found with monkey bone, if the layers allow it.
Sources
- Bows and arrows and complex symbolic displays 48,000 years ago Science Advances
- Clues to early bow-and-arrow hunting outside Africa Science News
Image credits
- The cliff at Pahiyangala, the cave also called Fa-Hien Lena. Palms stand in front. Pale rock shows near the base. The shelter mouth is not isolated in the frame, and the bone points are not in it. . Rapa123, CC BY-SA 3.0. Shown unedited.