United States rooms

Adams County, Ohio, United States

Serpent Mound

Adena or Fort Ancient (the charcoal and the soil disagree)

From the path you meet the effigy with its body winding, the head and its oval at the far end of the same ridge of earth. The path itself is modern. Pollinator, CC BY-SA 3.0. Shown unedited.

A serpent of earth long enough that the tail and the head will not fit in one glance, raised on the worn rim of a crater hundreds of millions of years old. Archaeologists have given that serpent to two cultures. Ask the sun to choose between them, and it will not.

Why this is extraordinary

On a bluff above Ohio Brush Creek, people raised an earthen ridge in the plan of a serpent, several hundred metres from the coiled tail to the oval at the head. It is the largest serpent effigy in North America. Burial mounds sit nearby, and a short walk south brings you to the traces of a later village. The snake has been offered to two cultures that never lived at the same time.

For a long time the effigy was Adena, the Early Woodland people of the last centuries before the common era, because Adena mounds and burials sit on the same ground. Charcoal from undisturbed fill in the body then dated near AD 1070, which lands in the Fort Ancient centuries. A 2014 campaign cored the base, dated the organic sediment to about 2,300 years ago, and read that as an Adena construction later repaired by Fort Ancient hands. The catch is that charcoal and humus in an old soil can be centuries older than the day a basket was emptied on top of them. Bulk dates from a mound often date the ground, not the building. Follow that reply and the serpent could have been raised any time after about 300 BC, with the charcoal in the fill as the closer clock.

The head has been lined up with the summer-solstice sunset. The summer solstice is the longest day, and on that evening the sun sets farther north than on any other day of the year. A sightline is a direction you can check by looking. You stand so the oval and the neck lie between you and the western skyline, and you watch whether the sun goes down along them. The Ohio History Connection describes the head and the oval as aligned to that setting sun. Across the centuries that separate Adena from Fort Ancient, the sun’s setting place at midsummer barely moves, less than the uncertainty of a local horizon and less than an earthwork several metres wide, so a solstice sightline, if it is real, does not date the snake.

A 2022 reconstruction aims the head-to-tail line at Scorpius, and then at the bright star in that constellation, on the summer-solstice night, in both the earlier and the later candidate century. A north–south ridge points at the southern summer sky anyway. No azimuth is copied here. A 1994 survey newsletter suggests the bright comet of 1066 as the model if the charcoal near 1070 is construction rather than repair. That is not a horizon measurement, and the same century is already the village.

What the serpent and that sunset meant to the people who raised the ridge is not written on the earth. Later traditions offer possible meanings, and they are not a transcript. A published account of eastern woodlands traditions describes the Great Serpent as a power of the waters and caverns under the earth, and, in some tellings, a presence in the night sky as well. Viewers have called the oval an egg, an eye, or an open mouth. A further reading takes the earthwork as an episode in a creation story of the Great Serpent and First Woman, told among Dhegiha Siouan peoples. The Ohio History Connection, writing with the Shawnee Tribe, says that reading does not show whose ancestors built the mound, and that the story, or a close variant, may once have been shared widely. Shawnee tradition includes a woman creator with many of First Woman’s traits, and a Snake Clan in the traditional religious community. Shawnee people returned to the mound for the summer solstice in 2021 and treat the place as sacred. That is a living use of the day. The sources used here do not describe a solstice ceremony from the year the ridge was raised.

Under the bluff the age is of another kind. The Ohio geological survey describes an impact structure about eight miles across, struck between about 252 and 330 million years ago, and the effigy sits on the eroded southwestern rim. The crater is not the mound, and the mound is not the crater.

What this changed

The shift, in short. The weighing further down is the longer argument.

Older textbook view
The effigy was called Adena because Adena mounds stand beside it, taken as a date of about 2,000 to 3,000 years.
New evidence
Charcoal in the fill near AD 1070, and later soil dates near 2,300 years ago drawn from cores at the base.
How it is dated
The clock is Radiocarbon. The charcoal is a piece of wood in the mound, and the soil dates are carbon already in the ground the mound buried.
What moved
The charcoal moved the public date into the Fort Ancient centuries, and the cores moved a possible start back to Adena, told as a repair.
What is still disputed
Soil humus in mounds is a poor clock for construction, and old wood can also enter the fill. The two dates are not yet one history.

Why it matters

If the effigy is Fort Ancient, it belongs with the maize farmers of the centuries around AD 1000, and the Adena graves nearby are neighbours in space and not in time. If it is Adena, and Fort Ancient people only mended it, a monument outlived the culture that raised it by a thousand years. The crater accounts for the broken bedrock, and it does not account for the snake.

Adena, here, is the Early Woodland of the Ohio Valley, conical burial mounds and a way of treating the dead, in the last millennium before the common era and a little after. Fort Ancient comes much later, after AD 1000, with villages and maize. A humate is carbon from old soil organic matter. An effigy mound is earth piled in the shape of a creature, as against a cone raised over a grave, and this serpent has not been shown to be a grave. A solstice sunset sightline is the direction of the sun as it sets on the longest day, checked by looking along the oval and the neck to the western skyline.

Photo tour

2 photographs, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

From the path you meet the effigy with its body winding, the head and its oval at the far end of the same ridge of earth. The path itself is modern.Pollinator, CC BY-SA 3.0
The coil, seen from above the tail, so that one curve of the body fills the frame. The oval head lies elsewhere along the same ridge.Niagara66, CC BY-SA 4.0

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

Open Two clocks in one ridge Two charcoal samples from shallow, undisturbed fill gave about AD 1070. A Fort Ancient village lies about 100 metres south, and serpent imagery is known on later shell ornaments of the wider Mississippian world, which is the case for a late build. The 2014 cores found organic sediment at the base and in the fill clustering a little after 2,300 years ago, along with a magnetometer hint of an abandoned coil near the head. The authors read an Adena original and a Fort Ancient renovation. Critics answer that dates on bulk sediment from a buried soil are expected to be too old, sometimes by millennia, because charcoal from ancient fires stays in the ground. They grant that the mound is younger than that soil, which means “after about 300 BC,” not “in the Adena century.” Both sides are using radiocarbon, and they are not dating the same event.
A sightline, not a date A sunset that fits both centuries The oval head and the neck have been surveyed toward the summer-solstice sunset, and less clearly toward a winter sunrise. On the longest evening of the year the sun sets at its northernmost place, and the check is whether that sunset falls along the oval and the neck. The Ohio History Connection also notes proposals that three curves of the body point to the summer-solstice sunrise, the equinoxes, and the winter-solstice sunrise. Those lines are short enough that other investigators read the same curves as lunar, and that account says the two readings of the curves cannot both be right. Across the two thousand years in dispute, the solstice sun on a flat horizon shifts by a fraction of a degree, smaller than a ridge of earth and smaller than a tree-lined skyline. An alignment can be intentional in either century, and it cannot tell you which. Lunar readings have also been proposed. The moon’s standstill cycle is 18.6 years, and a single earthwork can be drawn onto that cycle after the fact. A repeated observation, with the horizon height published, would be the test. A diagram that passes through the head is not yet that test.
Geological fact, motive unknown The crater under the bluff The Serpent Mound impact structure is about eight miles across. Shatter cones in the rock are the shock mark. The survey’s window for the strike is about 252 to 330 million years ago, after a long argument that had called the disturbance a collapsed dome or a volcanic crypt. The effigy uses the southwestern part of that ruined circle. People building on a hill of jumbled limestone may have noticed it. Nothing in the mound says they knew it was a crater, a word they did not have, or that they chose the hill because the rock was wrong. The coincidence is real, and a reason is not recovered from a coincidence.

Location and dating

Location
Serpent Mound, in Bratton Township, Adams County, Ohio, on a bluff of Ohio Brush Creek, inside the southwestern rim of the Serpent Mound impact structure.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision Either the Early Woodland, if the soil dates are the build, or the Fort Ancient centuries around AD 1070, if the charcoal in the fill is the build and the soil is only the ground beneath. The crater is Paleozoic.
How this dating was done
Ages come from Radiocarbon on charcoal in mound fill, and on organic sediment from cores, and the difference is what the carbon was doing before the basket arrived. The solstice line is archaeoastronomy, while the crater is dated by geology, not by the effigy.
What could change it
Charcoal from the very base of the serpent, sealed under the first loads, in more than one trench, so the wood cannot be dismissed as a later repair or as a soil older than the work.
Published ranges, drawn as bars. A bar is a claim about a span, not a point.
Soil dates from the coresContested
Charcoal in the fillContested
400 BCE500 CE1150 CE
  • Soil dates from the cores. About 2,300 years ago, Read by one team as the first construction and Read by critics as a maximum, the age of carbon already in the soil.
  • Charcoal in the fill. About AD 1070, in the Fort Ancient centuries, from two samples of undisturbed fill, the closest date to a fire and not automatically the date of the first basket.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Is the carbon at the base the year of construction, or the year of a fire long before the first load of earth? Open. That is the whole dating dispute.
Did the builders use the solstice, or does the head merely leave room for it? Open. The sightline does not choose Adena or Fort Ancient.
Does the head carry a solstice direction from a much older sky tradition, or only a sunset that later builders could have used? Open. The ridge and the alignment are real. Nothing dated at the site is older than about 2,300 years, and no published horizon study shows a better fit 12,800 years ago.

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

Built around AD 1070

Fort Ancient people raised the serpent. The charcoal in undisturbed fill is the construction. Adena presence on the bluff is earlier and separate, and Soil dates are the old ground, not the masons of earth.

What supports this

  • Two charcoal dates near AD 1070, taken from the fill.
  • A Fort Ancient village a short distance south of the ridge.
  • The known habit of bulk-soil dates in mounds to come out too old.

What pushes back

  • The 2014 cores are internally consistent, which a random mix of old charcoal might not be.
  • Repairing an older snake can put late charcoal into a ridge that was already standing.
  • Consistency among too-old soil dates is also what a landscape fire, centuries earlier, would leave behind.

What would settle it

The charcoal is the better kind of sample. It has not yet come from the buried ground surface in enough places to close the repair story.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

Adena built it, Fort Ancient repaired it

The serpent was raised about 2,300 years ago and renovated near AD 1070, perhaps on the stretches where it had slumped. The magnetometer coil near the head is a first design, later abandoned.

What supports this

  • Core dates cluster in the Early Woodland.
  • Adena mounds already stand on this bluff, so the place was an Adena ground.
  • A hidden coil would be a change of plan, and a change of plan fits a long life better than one late build.

What pushes back

  • What was dated is sediment and humus, the class of sample that other mound studies have shown predates construction.
  • The “complete lack” of later charcoal in a core is an absence, and a core is a narrow hole.
  • A magnetic anomaly is a place to dig, not a second serpent, until it is excavated.

What would settle it

A fair two-chapter history, whose chapter break depends on a kind of date that critics have a mechanical reason to distrust.

An emerging narrative

The sunset dates the builders

Because the head points at the summer-solstice sunset, the mound is said to belong to the century when that azimuth was exact, and the culture is then read off the sky.

What supports this

  • Surveys do place the head near the midsummer sunset.
  • A pile of burned stone that once sat inside the oval has been read as a foresight.

What pushes back

  • Between 300 BC and AD 1070 the sunset moves too little to pick one of them, once the skyline and the width of the ridge are admitted.
  • An approximate line can be had by chance, or kept because it was “close enough,” in either century.

What would settle it

The sightline deserves to stay on the table, and it is not a date.

An emerging narrative

A much older sky tradition carried forward

In this reading, Native American people built the mound. They chose a natural ridge whose head end already pointed toward the summer-solstice sunset, and they enhanced it. The design, and the sky knowledge in it, are read as carrying forward a much older astronomical tradition from the end of the last Ice Age, about 12,800 to 13,000 years ago. That tradition is linked to a proposed lost Ice Age culture, whose survivors, or whose knowledge, influenced later peoples after the Younger Dryas onset. Earth’s axial tilt changes slowly, and this reading says the solstice line fit the ridge better around 12,800 years ago than it does today. The size of the shift comes from a published solution for the tilt, listed with the sources. For the year 2000 that solution gives 23.439 degrees. It gives 24.159 degrees at 12,000 years before that year, and 24.089 degrees at 13,000 years before it. The printed steps are a thousand years apart, so 12,800 years before the year 2000 sits on the straight line between them, at 24.103 degrees. At about 39.0 degrees north, on a flat horizon, the sunrise angle A measured from north has a cosine equal to the sine of the tilt divided by the cosine of the latitude. The sunset azimuth is 360 degrees minus A, the same angle mirrored to the west, for the centre of the sun. Those figures put the year-2000 sunset at 300.79 degrees and the older sunset at 301.70 degrees, 0.91 degrees farther north of west. This arithmetic assumes a level skyline. It leaves out the width of the sun and the bending of light by the air, and it is not a survey of this bluff.

What supports this

  • The ridge is real, and surveys place the head near the summer-solstice sunset.
  • Sacred places are remodeled over time, so a later phase can hide an earliest one.
  • Similar alignments of earthworks with the sky have been cited at other mounds, including Poverty Point, where a solstice reading of the ridges has its own room.

What pushes back

  • No dated material at the site is older than about 2,300 years.
  • Over the centuries in dispute here, the sunset shifts too little for an alignment, by itself, to date the mound.
  • No published measured-horizon study shows the line fitting better 12,800 years ago.

What would settle it

A published survey of this horizon, with the skyline height, comparing the sunset now and at the older tilt, would test the better-fit reading. Material dated older than the soil dates, and sealed under the first loads, would test an earliest phase. Both tests are still open.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Open to revision

The effigy is real, and so is the crater beneath it. Which culture raised the snake is not settled, because the two radiocarbon materials date different events until someone shows otherwise. The solstice will not referee. Charcoal is the better sample, and the Adena-first reading is a live alternative that still needs a better sample than soil humus. The same sightline is also read as a much older sky tradition carried forward in the ridge. That reading sits beside the other two.

What drives this

  • Charcoal near AD 1070, recovered from the fill.
  • Soil dates near 2,300 years ago that may predate the basket loads.
  • A solstice azimuth too stable to choose.
  • An impact structure of Paleozoic age lying under the bluff.
  • A further reading of the sightline as sky knowledge from the end of the last Ice Age, with nothing dated at the site older than about 2,300 years.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

Built around AD 1070 Unsure Adena built it, Fort Ancient repaired it

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

Fort Ancient built the whole serpent

The Adena graves would be an earlier use of a striking hill, not the authorship of the effigy. Serpent imagery would then sit with the later farmers, and with the village next door.

Why it is still worth a test

Dates on the first loads in several trenches, every one of them Fort Ancient, with the old soil clearly underneath.

The builders chose the hill because the rock was shattered

The crater would become part of the monument’s meaning, a damaged earth noticed and answered with a serpent. That would be a new claim about what the builders knew, and the geology does not require it.

Why it is still worth a test

A comparison of this hill with other Adena and Fort Ancient choices of bedrock, asking whether broken stone was preferred or simply lived with.

Sources

  1. The Serpent Mound impact structure Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey
  2. A new multistage construction chronology for the Great Serpent Mound Journal of Archaeological Science
  3. Evaluating bulk sediment radiocarbon dates from Serpent Mound Ohio Archaeological Council
  4. Redating Serpent Mound Archaeology
  5. Ohio’s Serpent Mound — an American Indian story written in the earth Ohio History Connection
  6. The Great Serpent in Eastern North America University of Texas Press
  7. A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth Astronomy & Astrophysics
  8. Nominal solution La2004, obliquity before the present IMCCE
  9. Scorpius on the summer-solstice night Journal of Skyscape Archaeology, 2022. Aims the head-to-tail line at Scorpius, and then at the bright star in that constellation, on the summer-solstice night, in both candidate centuries. No azimuth is copied.
  10. Ohio Geology, winter 1994 Suggests the bright comet of 1066 as a model if charcoal near 1070 is construction rather than repair. Not a horizon measurement.

Image credits