Vanuatu rooms

Tomman Island and southwest Malakula, Vanuatu

Malakula shaped skulls

A living practice into the twentieth century (bound in infancy, and a memorial skull)

A memorial head from southwest Malekula, in the Wellcome catalogue. The vault is high and long. The face is modelled in clay and fibre over the bone. The catalogue says the elongation was produced by circular constriction. Wellcome Collection, CC BY 4.0. Shown unedited.

On Tomman and the facing coast of southwest Malakula, a child’s head was bound every day for about six months, starting about a month after birth. The longest heads were read as intelligence, rank, and a closeness to spirits, and the origin story gives the same head to a culture hero named Ambat.

Why this is extraordinary

Southwest Malakula kept a long head on purpose. About a month after birth, on Tomman Island and the coast that faces it, the child’s scalp was rubbed with a burnt paste of candle-nut. Over that went a soft bandage cut from the inner bark of a banana tree, then a cap woven from pandanus, then a fibre rope to hold the cap. The Australian Museum’s account says the wrapping was renewed every day for about six months. The longest results belong to the Nahai-speaking area of Tomman and the mainland opposite. Other districts on the same island aimed at a slightly different outline. A skull accepts a bandage only while it is still growing. An adult head will not take this shape.

What the shape was for is written down beside the recipe. The culture hero Ambat is said to have had an elongated head and a fine long nose, and in parts of the southern coast the binding begins with him. A person with a finely drawn head was thought more intelligent, of higher status, and closer to the spirits. The Bislama phrase longfala hed still means a long head and, by that route, intelligence. So the recorded likenesses are an ancestor-hero, a mark of rank, and a nearness to spirits. They are not, in the sources used here, an animal, and they are not a hat. A memorial figure in Berlin, collected in 1896, holds branches above a modelled face. That is the costume of the figure. It is not a pattern for the baby’s cap, and if a skull sits inside the figure the glass hides its outline.

The skull in the first photograph is the bone itself. The Wellcome catalogue calls it a memorial head from southwest Malekula, the face rebuilt in clay and fibre, the elongation produced by circular constriction. You can see the vault, high and long, and the crack in it, and the modelled face ending where the bone begins. This is a dead person’s head kept as a person. It is the same idea as the Berlin figure, one step earlier, before the body of vegetable paste and pigment is built around the skull.

A different reading takes Ambat as a memory of people who were born looking like that, and takes the bandages as a later imitation. A natural long head is possible. A suture that closes too soon will lengthen one vault on its own. What that reading has to clear is the recipe. Paste, bark, cap, and rope, on a calendar of about six months, produce the outline in a child who was born ordinary. Districts differ, which is what a custom does and what a single inborn population does not. No source used here ties the practice to a sunrise or a star. The sky, if it is anywhere, is the “world of the spirits” the fine head was said to approach, and that phrase is a belief about persons, not an azimuth. What this changes: if a cemetery on Tomman ever shows the long heads only in one family and only after a dated arrival, Ambat might be a migration. If bound and unbound skulls sit in the same villages for as far back as the graves go, the hero is the name of a look the island made.

Why it matters

A bound head can copy an ancestor, mark an elite, imitate a spirit or an animal or a headdress, or record a group who already looked that way. The recipe decides most of that. A shape you can produce with bark and a cap is not a shape you have to be born with. What the shape was for is the part the recipe does not finish.

The pin is Tomman Island, where the longest heads are described, and the facing southwest mainland. The skull in the photograph is a memorial from that coast, face rebuilt in clay, not a living portrait. A second figure in Berlin is the kind of memorial the skull was made to serve. The same family of infant binding is weighed for Bavaria, the Paracas coast, the Maya, and the Northwest Coast.

Photo tour

2 photographs, unedited. On a phone, swipe the row. Choose one to look closely.

A memorial head from southwest Malekula, in the Wellcome catalogue. The vault is high and long. The face is modelled in clay and fibre over the bone. The catalogue says the elongation was produced by circular constriction. Wellcome Collection, CC BY 4.0
A Malekula memorial figure in Berlin, from the Zembsch collection of 1896. The face is modelled. The arms hold branches. If a skull is inside, the photograph does not show its outline. Masks in the case below are a different object. FA2010, Public domain

What is still unexplained

These sit beside the consensus account, with the same visual weight. None of them is marked solved.

The practice as recorded A recipe, six months long Binding began about a month after birth. Each day the head was smeared with a burnt paste of candle-nut, to soften the skin and limit a rash, then wrapped in a soft bandage from the inner bark of a banana tree, covered with a pandanus cap, and held with fibre rope. The Australian Museum’s account of Tomman and the Nahai-speaking coast says this continued every day for about six months. Styles differ by language area. The longest heads are on Tomman and the mainland opposite. A skull grows into a bandage. It cannot be given this outline in adulthood. The Wellcome catalogue, for a memorial head from southwest Malekula, says the elongation was produced by circular constriction. The face on that skull is clay and fibre. The vault is bone.
Open Hero, rank, spirits The same museum account ties the origin of binding, in parts of southern Malakula, to the culture hero Ambat, who himself had an elongated head and a long nose. A finely elongated head is described as more intelligent, of higher status, and closer to the world of the spirits. In Bislama the phrase longfala hed, long head, still means intelligence. So the documented meanings are an ancestor-hero who looked like this, a mark of rank, and a closeness to spirits. A memorial figure uses the skull of a dead person and rebuilds the face, which is an ancestor you can stand in a house. That is a use of the head after death. It is not a separate origin for the shape.
Open Animal, headdress, or a people born this way No source used here says the binding copied an animal, or that it copied a hat. The Berlin figure wears a tall arrangement of branches, which is the costume of a memorial, not a template for a baby’s bandage. A born difference is the reading Ambat allows, if the hero is a memory of people who already had the head. Against that reading, the recipe produces the shape in a child who was not born with it, the result varies by district, and a suture that closed too early, craniosynostosis, would not come with a published daily method or prefer one island. The Bavarian skulls sort with migrant women. These Malakula heads sort with a local practice someone was willing to describe step by step.

Location and dating

Location
Tomman Island and the southwest coast of Malakula, Malampa, Vanuatu. The Wellcome head is catalogued as southwest Malekula. The Berlin figure is catalogued as Malekula, from the Zembsch collection of 1896. The pin is Tomman, the island named for the longest heads, not a surveyed grave.
Period label
Current consensus — open to revision Recorded as a living practice into the twentieth century, and present in collections made in the late nineteenth. No radiocarbon date for the start of binding on Malakula is in the sources used here.
How this dating was done
Ethnography of the binding, and museum catalogues of the memorial skulls. There is no radiocarbon series for the Tomman practice in the sources used here.
What could change it
A dated burial sequence on Tomman or the facing coast, with bound and unbound skulls in stratigraphic order, would show when the recipe started and whether it arrived with a migration or grew locally.

What is actually there

Open questions

Question Status
Was Ambat a memory of people who looked different, or the name of a look the binding created? Open. The story gives him the head. The recipe shows a child can be given it.
Did the shape mark an elite, or anyone whose family kept the custom? Open. Higher status is the recorded reading of a fine head. The sources used here do not count how many children in a village were bound.

The current narrative

Where publication stands today. It is the best-supported reading, and it is open to revision. It is not a verdict.

The current narrative — open to revision

A childhood binding, aimed at a hero and at rank

The long heads of southwest Malakula were made in infancy by boards of bark and a cap, and they were understood as a likeness of Ambat and as a sign of intelligence, status, and closeness to spirits. The memorial skulls are that shape kept after death.

What supports this

  • A published daily recipe, about six months long, starting a month after birth.
  • The longest results are local to Tomman and the facing coast, which fits a custom with a geography.
  • Ambat’s own elongated head, and the phrase that still equates a long head with intelligence, are the meanings the ethnography prints.

What pushes back

  • The recipe is a museum summary of a practice, not a count of skulls from one excavated cemetery.
  • Ambat can be read the other way, as a person who was born with the head and then imitated.
  • The Berlin figure’s branches show that memorials also carry costume. Costume and binding can be confused in a single photograph if the skull is covered.

What would settle it

It is the centre because the method is described in materials and in days, and a memorial skull from that coast has the vault the method predicts. A born population is not required.

Emerging narratives

Other published readings. Each may be right. None is adopted here unless the evidence carries it.

An emerging narrative

A group who already looked like this

The binding commemorates, or imitates, people whose heads were naturally long. Ambat is the memory of that group, and the bandages are how later families tried to keep the look.

What supports this

  • The origin story gives the hero the head before it gives anyone a bandage.
  • Cranial shape does vary among people without any binding, so a striking natural head is possible in principle.
  • Memorial figures treat the dead as persons to be kept, which fits an ancestor cult whether or not the first ancestor was bound.

What pushes back

  • A six-month recipe produces the outline in a child. A natural long head is not needed to explain a vault that was bandaged.
  • The result varies by district, which a single biological population would not map so neatly onto one island and its facing shore.
  • Craniosynostosis lengthens one skull by closing a suture. It does not arrive with a pandanus cap and a candle-nut paste.

What would settle it

It stays because the hero story is real testimony and a natural long head is a real biological possibility. It does not lead while the recipe accounts for the skulls the catalogues describe.

Should the current view be reevaluated?

Consensus holds well

Infant binding is the centre, with the hero, the rank, and the spirits as the meanings the ethnography actually gives. Animal, headdress, and a born population stay as readings the sources used here do not carry, or carry only as the hero story’s other face.

What drives this

  • A six-month recipe of paste, bark, pandanus, and rope, starting a month after birth.
  • Ambat’s elongated head, and the link from a fine head to rank, intelligence, and spirits.
  • A southwest Malekula memorial skull whose catalogue names circular constriction.

This is the museum’s own weighing of the evidence. It is not a visitor vote, and it is separate from the slider.

Weigh it yourself

Anonymous. Nothing here is stored except on this browser. Your lean does not change the assessment beside it.

A childhood binding, aimed at a hero and at rank Unsure A group who already looked like this

If the contested reading is right

What would follow if a reading that is not the consensus turned out to be true, and what could settle it. This explains the stakes. It does not adopt the reading.

Ambat remembers a people born with the head

The bandages would be an imitation of a look that existed first as biology or as a distant group, and the custom would be a portrait of them rather than the source of the shape. The recipe would still be real for every child it was used on.

Why it is still worth a test

A cemetery series that separates bound skulls from unbound ones with measurements, and a date for the first bound burial on Tomman.

Sources

  1. Headshaping Australian Museum
  2. Elongated skull for a memorial head, Wellcome M0012657 Wellcome Collection catalogue note on the southwest Malekula skull

Image credits